Development of a new stroke scale in an emergency setting

• Published in: BMC neurology 2016-09, Vol.16 (1), p.168-168, Article 168
• Main Authors: Mao, Haifeng, Lin, Peiyi, Mo, Junrong, Li, Yunmei, Chen, Xiaohui, Rainer, Timothy H, Jiang, Huilin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Care and treatment; Cohort Studies; Diagnosis; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Physiological aspects; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke (Disease); Stroke - diagnosis
• ISSN: 1471-2377; 1471-2377
• DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0695-z

Early identification of stroke is crucial to maximize early management benefits in emergency departments. This study aimed to develop and validate a new stroke recognition instrument for differentiating acute stroke from stroke mimics in an emergency setting. A prospective observational cohort study among suspected stroke patients presenting to Emergency Department in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University was conducted from May 2012 to March 2013. The symptoms and signs of suspected stroke patients were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with acute stroke. The symptoms and signs closely associated with acute stroke were selected to develop the new stroke scale, Guangzhou Stroke Scale (GZSS). The diagnostic value of GZSS was then compared with ROSIER, FAST and LAPSS. The primary outcome was confirmed stroke by CT within 24 h. Four hundred and sixteen suspected stroke patients (247 ischemia, 107 hemorrhage, 4 transient ischemic attack, 58 non-stroke) were assessed. A new stroke scale, GZSS (total score from -1 to 8.5), was developed and consisted of nine parameters: vertigo (-1), GCS ≤ 8 (+2), facial paralysis (+1), asymmetric arm weakness (+1), asymmetric leg weakness (+1), speech disturbance (+0.5), visual field defect (+1), systolic blood pressure ≥145 mmHg (+1) and diastolic blood pressure ≥95 mmHg (+1). Among the four scales, the discriminatory value (C-statistic) of GZSS was the best (AUC: 0.871 (p 1.5 on a scale from -1 to 8.5, the sensitivity and specificity of GZSS were 83.2 and 74.1 %, whilst the sensitivities and specificities of ROSIER were 77.7 and 70.7 %, FAST were 76.0 and 63.8 %, LAPSS were 56.4 and 87.9 %. GZSS had better sensitivity than existing stroke scales in Chinese patients with suspected stroke. Further studies should be conducted to confirm its effectiveness in the initial differentiation of acute stroke from stroke mimics.