The behavioral effects of a mixed efficacy antinociceptive peptide, VRP26, following chronic administration in mice

• Published in: Psychopharmacology 2016-07, Vol.233 (13), p.2479-2487
• Main Authors: Anand, Jessica P., Boyer, Brett T., Mosberg, Henry I., Jutkiewicz, Emily M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology; Analysis; Animals; Behavior; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Tolerance - physiology; Female; Fentanyl - pharmacology; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Motor Activity - drug effects; Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology; Neurosciences; Opioids; Original Investigation; Peptides; Peptides, Cyclic - pharmacology; Pharmacological research; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Psychiatry; Psychopharmacology; Receptors, Opioid, delta - antagonists & inhibitors; Receptors, Opioid, mu - agonists; Reward; Rodents; Studies
• ISSN: 0033-3158; 1432-2072
• DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4296-8

Rationale VRP26 displays mu opioid receptor agonist and delta opioid receptor antagonist activity in vitro, a pharmacological profile purported to produce reduced tolerance, dependence, and rewarding effects. We hypothesized that VRP26 would display reduced adverse effects after chronic administration as compared with the traditional opioid analgesic fentanyl. Objective The aim of this study is to explore the development of tolerance, dependence, and conditioned place preference of VRP26 as compared with the traditional opioid analgesic fentanyl. Methods The antinociceptive effects of VRP26 and fentanyl were assessed using the mouse warm water tail withdrawal (WWTW) assay. Measurement of antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence occurred after 7 days of continuous administration of either fentanyl (0.3 mg/kg/day) or VRP26 (10 mg/kg/day); tolerance was measured by a shift in the antinociceptive dose response curve in the WWTW assay. Physical dependence was determined by observation of withdrawal symptoms after precipitated withdrawal. Rewarding effects were measured by the ability of VRP26 or fentanyl to produce conditioned place preference. Results Fentanyl produced significant tolerance and dependence, as well as significant conditioned place preference. VRP26 produced neither tolerance nor physical dependence, nor did it produce significant conditioned place preference. Conclusions These results suggest that chronic treatment with VRP26 may produce less tolerance or physical dependence than chronic treatment with clinically available mu opioid analgesics such as fentanyl. Additionally, VRP26 produces less rewarding effects than fentanyl. This desirable in vivo profile may be due to the mixed efficacy nature of VRP26 and could provide the framework for safer opioid analgesics.