Loading…

Electronically captured, patient‐reported physical function: an important vital sign in obesity medicine

Summary Objectives Impaired physical function (i.e., inability to walk 200 feet, climb a flight of stairs or perform activities of daily living) predicts poor clinical outcomes and adversely impacts medical and surgical weight management. However, routine assessment physical function is seldom perfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity science & practice 2016-12, Vol.2 (4), p.399-406
Main Authors: Fleming, J., Wood, G. C., Seiler, C., Cook, A., Lent, M. R., Still, C. D., Benotti, P. N., Irving, B. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Objectives Impaired physical function (i.e., inability to walk 200 feet, climb a flight of stairs or perform activities of daily living) predicts poor clinical outcomes and adversely impacts medical and surgical weight management. However, routine assessment physical function is seldom performed clinically. The PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 20a (SF‐20a) is a validated questionnaire for assessing patient reported physical function, which includes published T‐score percentiles adjusted for gender, age and education. However, the effect that increasing levels of obesity has on these percentiles is unclear. We hypothesized that physical function would decline with increasing level of obesity independent of gender, age, education and comorbidity. Materials and Methods This study included 1,627 consecutive weight management patients [(mean ± SEM), 44.7 ± 0.3 years and 45.1 ± 0.2 kg/m2] that completed the PROMIS SF‐20a during their initial consultation. We evaluated the association between obesity level and PROMIS T‐score percentiles using multiple linear regression adjusting for gender, age, education and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results Multiple linear regression T‐score percentiles were lower in obesity class 2 (−12.4%tile, p 
ISSN:2055-2238
2055-2238
DOI:10.1002/osp4.67