Loading…

Selective reoperation after primary resection as a feasible and safe treatment strategy for recurrent pancreatic cancer

Local recurrence frequently occurs in patients with pancreatic cancer after intended curative resections. However, no treatment strategies have been established for isolated local recurrence. Several series have demonstrated a survival benefit for reoperation in selected pancreatic recurrence cases....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2016-07, Vol.95 (30), p.e4191-e4191
Main Authors: Chang, Shih-Chun, Hsu, Chih-Po, Tsai, Chun-Yi, Liu, Yu-Yin, Liu, Keng-Hao, Hsu, Jun-Te, Yeh, Ta-Sen, Yeh, Chun-Nan, Hwang, Tsann-Long
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Local recurrence frequently occurs in patients with pancreatic cancer after intended curative resections. However, no treatment strategies have been established for isolated local recurrence. Several series have demonstrated a survival benefit for reoperation in selected pancreatic recurrence cases. This study compares the difference in overall survival (OS) between surgery and nonsurgery groups in recurrent pancreatic cancer.All patients from 1990 to 2014 with recurrent pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resections were investigated and retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological features and OS were compared.A total of 332 patients were recruited in this series. The majority had histologically pancreatic adenocarcinoma (289 patients, 87.0%). Fourteen of 332 patients (4.2%) with recurrent pancreatic cancer received subsequent resection. Most of these patients underwent curative surgery (R0 resection, 13 patients, 92.9%), and only 1 patient (7.1%) had microscopic residual tumor (R1 resection). Disease-free survival (DFS), OS, and postrecurrence survival (PRS) were all significantly longer in the surgery group (DFS 10.6 vs 6.1 months, P = 0.044; OS 57.8 vs 14.0 months, P 
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000004191