Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the Trust in Oncologist Scale—the Trust in Oncologist Scale–short form (TiOS-SF)

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer 2017-03, Vol.25 (3), p.855-861
• Main Authors: Hillen, Marij A., Postma, Rosa-May, Verdam, Mathilde G. E., Smets, Ellen M. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Analysis; Communication; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Humans; Male; Medical research; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Neoplasms - psychology; Neoplasms - therapy; Nursing; Nursing Research; Oncologists; Oncology; Original; Original Article; Pain Medicine; Patient Satisfaction; Physician patient relationships; Physician-Patient Relations; Psychometrics - methods; Quantitative psychology; Rehabilitation Medicine; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Trust; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3473-y

Purpose The original 18-item, four-dimensional Trust in Oncologist Scale assesses cancer patients’ trust in their oncologist. The current aim was to develop and validate a short form version of the scale to enable more efficient assessment of cancer patients’ trust. Methods Existing validation data of the full-length Trust in Oncologist Scale were used to create a short form of the Trust in Oncologist Scale. The resulting short form was validated in a new sample of cancer patients ( n  = 92). Socio-demographics, medical characteristics, trust in the oncologist, satisfaction with communication, trust in healthcare, willingness to recommend the oncologist to others and to contact the oncologist in case of questions were assessed. Internal consistency, reliability, convergent and structural validity were tested. Results The five-item Trust in Oncologist Scale Short Form was created by selecting the statistically best performing item from each dimension of the original scale, to ensure content validity. Mean trust in the oncologist was high in the validation sample (response rate 86%, M  = 4.30, SD  = 0.98). Exploratory factor analyses supported one-dimensionality of the short form. Internal consistency was high, and temporal stability was moderate. Initial convergent validity was suggested by moderate correlations between trust scores with associated constructs. Conclusions The Trust in Oncologist Scale Short Form appears to efficiently, reliably and validly measures cancer patients’ trust in their oncologist. It may be used in research and as a quality indicator in clinical practice. More thorough validation of the scale is recommended to confirm this initial evidence of its validity.