Loading…

Use of Proviral DNA to Investigate Virus Resistance Mutations in HIV-infected Zimbabweans

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) to suppress HIV replication has reduced morbidity and mortality yet effectiveness of current HIV drugs is threatened by HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations. To determine HIVDR mutations using proviral DNA from specimens of patients presenting to an HIV treatment clinic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The open microbiology journal 2017-04, Vol.11 (1), p.45-52
Main Authors: Musingwini, Tutsirai V, Zhou, Danai T, Mhandire, Doreen, Duri, Kerina, Gomo, Exnevia, Oktedalen, Olav, Chimukangara, Benjamin, Shamu, Tinei, Shawarira-Bote, Sandra, Dandara, Collet, Stray-Pedersen, Babill
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Antiretroviral therapy (ART) to suppress HIV replication has reduced morbidity and mortality yet effectiveness of current HIV drugs is threatened by HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) mutations. To determine HIVDR mutations using proviral DNA from specimens of patients presenting to an HIV treatment clinic. DNA from 103 patients, 86 treatment-experienced, 17 treatment-naïve, were genotyped for the HIV-1C reverse transcriptase gene (RT; codons 21-304) using Sanger sequencing and sequences analyzed using Sequencher software. Resistance mutations were interpreted using Stanford HIVDR reference database. Median age was 39 (IQR, 33-46) years and 80% of patients were female. Six-percent (n=6) had at least one HIVDR mutation, comprising NRTI-associated mutations, (M184V, T69D, T69N and V75I); NNRTI-associated mutations (G190A, K103N, V106M, Y181C) and thymidine analogue associated mutations (D67N, K70R, K219Q, L210W, M41L, T215Y). Of the six participants, with at least one HIVDR mutation, all were treatment experienced, five were on tenofovir, lamivudine and nevirapine and one was on tenofovir, lamivudine and atazanavir. There was no difference in median CD4 count and viral loads when patients were compared by presence of HIVDR mutations. We demonstrated the use of proviral DNA in HIVDR testing in adult patients and present that all the patients with various kinds of HIVDR mutations were treatment experienced, pointing to the role of drug regimens in driving viral mutations. Thus, the use of proviral DNA has potential to help provide surveillance on risk of HIVDR in HIV-infected individuals who are on treatment, which may assist in corrective treatment.
ISSN:1874-2858
1874-2858
DOI:10.2174/1874285801711010045