Loading…
Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited
Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi...
Saved in:
Published in: | IMA fungus 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3 |
container_end_page | 129 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | IMA fungus |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Kruse, Julia Doehlemann, Gunther Kemen, Eric Thines, Marco |
description | Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus
belong to the smut fungi (
) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most
species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as
(syn.
) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent
are interspersed with
sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in
, but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus
, suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of
. In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that
has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for
on other host genera than
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5493530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2547653093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottT-BV3w4qXr5KtJLkIpfkHFi55DdpNtt-xuatIt1l_vltaizmUG8szLvHkRusKQcq7kbVmbom3mbUwJYJGCTAGnoE5QnxAMozHl6vQ4M-ihYYxL6IopShWcox6RkjDJWB_RSXSfrakS09jkMNY-rBYx8UXy4l38Kn29zV1MgtuUsVw7e4HOClNFNzz0AXp_uH-bPo1mr4_P08lslDPG1yPFM4kNWG4LVQBQwvMcKIAVjOZUABECLFXWCVEwaWEsHbE0kzIzgnCc0QG62-uu2qx2NnfNOphKr0L3AWGrvSn135emXOi532jeGeUUOoGbg0DwH62La12XMXdVZRrn26ixoqAoI5J36PU_dOnb0HT2NOFMjPmO7Cixp_LgYwyuOB6DQe-y0cds9C4bDVID1t3qAF3-9nLc-0mCfgM4Qoz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547653093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kruse, Julia ; Doehlemann, Gunther ; Kemen, Eric ; Thines, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Julia ; Doehlemann, Gunther ; Kemen, Eric ; Thines, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus
belong to the smut fungi (
) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most
species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as
(syn.
) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent
are interspersed with
sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in
, but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus
, suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of
. In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that
has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for
on other host genera than
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-6340</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2210-6359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-6359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28824844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Asexuality ; Biological control ; Fungi ; Host range ; Names ; Pathogenicity ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Smut ; Species</subject><ispartof>IMA fungus, 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>2017 International Mycological Association 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2547653093/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2547653093?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doehlemann, Gunther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemen, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thines, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</title><title>IMA fungus</title><addtitle>IMA Fungus</addtitle><description>Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus
belong to the smut fungi (
) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most
species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as
(syn.
) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent
are interspersed with
sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in
, but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus
, suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of
. In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that
has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for
on other host genera than
.</description><subject>Asexuality</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Host range</subject><subject>Names</subject><subject>Pathogenicity</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Smut</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>2210-6340</issn><issn>2210-6359</issn><issn>2210-6359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottT-BV3w4qXr5KtJLkIpfkHFi55DdpNtt-xuatIt1l_vltaizmUG8szLvHkRusKQcq7kbVmbom3mbUwJYJGCTAGnoE5QnxAMozHl6vQ4M-ihYYxL6IopShWcox6RkjDJWB_RSXSfrakS09jkMNY-rBYx8UXy4l38Kn29zV1MgtuUsVw7e4HOClNFNzz0AXp_uH-bPo1mr4_P08lslDPG1yPFM4kNWG4LVQBQwvMcKIAVjOZUABECLFXWCVEwaWEsHbE0kzIzgnCc0QG62-uu2qx2NnfNOphKr0L3AWGrvSn135emXOi532jeGeUUOoGbg0DwH62La12XMXdVZRrn26ixoqAoI5J36PU_dOnb0HT2NOFMjPmO7Cixp_LgYwyuOB6DQe-y0cds9C4bDVID1t3qAF3-9nLc-0mCfgM4Qoz0</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Kruse, Julia</creator><creator>Doehlemann, Gunther</creator><creator>Kemen, Eric</creator><creator>Thines, Marco</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>International Mycological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</title><author>Kruse, Julia ; Doehlemann, Gunther ; Kemen, Eric ; Thines, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Asexuality</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Host range</topic><topic>Names</topic><topic>Pathogenicity</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Smut</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doehlemann, Gunther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemen, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thines, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>IMA fungus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruse, Julia</au><au>Doehlemann, Gunther</au><au>Kemen, Eric</au><au>Thines, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</atitle><jtitle>IMA fungus</jtitle><addtitle>IMA Fungus</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>117-129</pages><issn>2210-6340</issn><issn>2210-6359</issn><eissn>2210-6359</eissn><abstract>Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus
belong to the smut fungi (
) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most
species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as
(syn.
) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent
are interspersed with
sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in
, but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus
, suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of
. In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that
has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for
on other host genera than
.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>28824844</pmid><doi>10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2210-6340 |
ispartof | IMA fungus, 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129 |
issn | 2210-6340 2210-6359 2210-6359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5493530 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Asexuality Biological control Fungi Host range Names Pathogenicity Phylogenetics Phylogeny Smut Species |
title | Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asexual%20and%20sexual%20morphs%20of%20Moesziomyces%20revisited&rft.jtitle=IMA%20fungus&rft.au=Kruse,%20Julia&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=117-129&rft.issn=2210-6340&rft.eissn=2210-6359&rft_id=info:doi/10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2547653093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547653093&rft_id=info:pmid/28824844&rfr_iscdi=true |