Loading…

Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited

Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IMA fungus 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129
Main Authors: Kruse, Julia, Doehlemann, Gunther, Kemen, Eric, Thines, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3
container_end_page 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title IMA fungus
container_volume 8
creator Kruse, Julia
Doehlemann, Gunther
Kemen, Eric
Thines, Marco
description Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as (syn. ) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent are interspersed with sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in , but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus , suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of . In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for on other host genera than .
doi_str_mv 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5493530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2547653093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottT-BV3w4qXr5KtJLkIpfkHFi55DdpNtt-xuatIt1l_vltaizmUG8szLvHkRusKQcq7kbVmbom3mbUwJYJGCTAGnoE5QnxAMozHl6vQ4M-ihYYxL6IopShWcox6RkjDJWB_RSXSfrakS09jkMNY-rBYx8UXy4l38Kn29zV1MgtuUsVw7e4HOClNFNzz0AXp_uH-bPo1mr4_P08lslDPG1yPFM4kNWG4LVQBQwvMcKIAVjOZUABECLFXWCVEwaWEsHbE0kzIzgnCc0QG62-uu2qx2NnfNOphKr0L3AWGrvSn135emXOi532jeGeUUOoGbg0DwH62La12XMXdVZRrn26ixoqAoI5J36PU_dOnb0HT2NOFMjPmO7Cixp_LgYwyuOB6DQe-y0cds9C4bDVID1t3qAF3-9nLc-0mCfgM4Qoz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547653093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kruse, Julia ; Doehlemann, Gunther ; Kemen, Eric ; Thines, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Julia ; Doehlemann, Gunther ; Kemen, Eric ; Thines, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as (syn. ) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent are interspersed with sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in , but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus , suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of . In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for on other host genera than .</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-6340</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2210-6359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-6359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28824844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Asexuality ; Biological control ; Fungi ; Host range ; Names ; Pathogenicity ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Smut ; Species</subject><ispartof>IMA fungus, 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</rights><rights>2017 International Mycological Association 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2547653093/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2547653093?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doehlemann, Gunther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemen, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thines, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</title><title>IMA fungus</title><addtitle>IMA Fungus</addtitle><description>Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as (syn. ) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent are interspersed with sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in , but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus , suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of . In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for on other host genera than .</description><subject>Asexuality</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Host range</subject><subject>Names</subject><subject>Pathogenicity</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Smut</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>2210-6340</issn><issn>2210-6359</issn><issn>2210-6359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMottT-BV3w4qXr5KtJLkIpfkHFi55DdpNtt-xuatIt1l_vltaizmUG8szLvHkRusKQcq7kbVmbom3mbUwJYJGCTAGnoE5QnxAMozHl6vQ4M-ihYYxL6IopShWcox6RkjDJWB_RSXSfrakS09jkMNY-rBYx8UXy4l38Kn29zV1MgtuUsVw7e4HOClNFNzz0AXp_uH-bPo1mr4_P08lslDPG1yPFM4kNWG4LVQBQwvMcKIAVjOZUABECLFXWCVEwaWEsHbE0kzIzgnCc0QG62-uu2qx2NnfNOphKr0L3AWGrvSn135emXOi532jeGeUUOoGbg0DwH62La12XMXdVZRrn26ixoqAoI5J36PU_dOnb0HT2NOFMjPmO7Cixp_LgYwyuOB6DQe-y0cds9C4bDVID1t3qAF3-9nLc-0mCfgM4Qoz0</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Kruse, Julia</creator><creator>Doehlemann, Gunther</creator><creator>Kemen, Eric</creator><creator>Thines, Marco</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>International Mycological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</title><author>Kruse, Julia ; Doehlemann, Gunther ; Kemen, Eric ; Thines, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Asexuality</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Host range</topic><topic>Names</topic><topic>Pathogenicity</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Smut</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruse, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doehlemann, Gunther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemen, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thines, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>IMA fungus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruse, Julia</au><au>Doehlemann, Gunther</au><au>Kemen, Eric</au><au>Thines, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited</atitle><jtitle>IMA fungus</jtitle><addtitle>IMA Fungus</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>117-129</pages><issn>2210-6340</issn><issn>2210-6359</issn><eissn>2210-6359</eissn><abstract>Yeasts of the now unused asexually typified genus belong to the smut fungi ( ) and are mostly believed to be apathogenic asexual yeasts derived from smut fungi that have lost pathogenicity on plants. However, phylogenetic studies have shown that most species are phylogenetically close to smut fungi parasitic to plants, suggesting that some of the species might represent adventitious isolations of the yeast morph of otherwise plant pathogenic smut fungi. However, there are some species, such as (syn. ) that are isolated throughout the world and sometimes are also found in clinical samples and do not have a known plant pathogenic sexual morph. In this study, it is revealed by phylogenetic investigations that isolates of the biocontrol agent are interspersed with sexual lineages, suggesting conspecificity. This raises doubts regarding the apathogenic nature of asexual morphs previously placed in , but suggests that there might also be pathogenic sexual morph counterparts for those species known only from asexual morphs. The finding that several additional species currently only known from their yeast morphs are embedded within the genus , suggests that the yeast morph might play a more dominant role in this genus as compared to other genera of . In addition, phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrated that has a narrow host range and that some previously described but not widely used species names should be applied for on other host genera than .</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>28824844</pmid><doi>10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-6340
ispartof IMA fungus, 2017-06, Vol.8 (1), p.117-129
issn 2210-6340
2210-6359
2210-6359
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5493530
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Asexuality
Biological control
Fungi
Host range
Names
Pathogenicity
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Smut
Species
title Asexual and sexual morphs of Moesziomyces revisited
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asexual%20and%20sexual%20morphs%20of%20Moesziomyces%20revisited&rft.jtitle=IMA%20fungus&rft.au=Kruse,%20Julia&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=117-129&rft.issn=2210-6340&rft.eissn=2210-6359&rft_id=info:doi/10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.09&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2547653093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-95b81a0d5df9f00325cc0300d743c3702770d39de77f48d068e2d3b88ba7251b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547653093&rft_id=info:pmid/28824844&rfr_iscdi=true