Loading…

Computer tomography guided lung biopsy using interactive breath-hold control: a randomized study

Interactive breath-hold control (IBC) may improve the accuracy and decrease the complication rate of computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy, but this presumption has not been proven in a randomized study. Patients admitted for CT-guided lung biopsy were randomized to biopsy either with (N=201)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of translational medicine 2017-06, Vol.5 (12), p.253-253
Main Authors: Ashraf, Haseem, Krag-Andersen, Shella, Naqibullah, Matiullah, Minddal, Valentina, Nørgaard, Annette, Naur, Therese Maria Henriette, Myschetzky, Peter Sand, Clementsen, Paul Frost
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Interactive breath-hold control (IBC) may improve the accuracy and decrease the complication rate of computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy, but this presumption has not been proven in a randomized study. Patients admitted for CT-guided lung biopsy were randomized to biopsy either with (N=201) or without (N=206) IBC. Biopsy accuracy, procedure time, radiation, and complications were compared in the two groups. Predictors for pneumothorax were analyzed. Procedures performed with the use of IBC (N=130) did not show higher biopsy accuracy (P=0.979) but were associated with a higher risk of pneumothorax (P=0.022) compared to procedures without the use of IBC (N=171). Overall, 50% of the biopsies were malignant, 13% were benign, and 33% were inconclusive (4% missing). Long needle time (P=0.037) and small nodule size (P=0.001) were predictors of pneumothorax. The use of IBC for CT-guided lung biopsy was not an advantage for unselected patients in our care, since it did not improve the biopsy accuracy and the risk of pneumothorax was increased.
ISSN:2305-5839
2305-5839
DOI:10.21037/atm.2017.05.10