The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and practice, the outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders including patients and the public...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine 2017-06, Vol.18 (Suppl 3), p.280-50, Article 280
Main Authors: Williamson, Paula R., Altman, Douglas G., Bagley, Heather, Barnes, Karen L., Blazeby, Jane M., Brookes, Sara T., Clarke, Mike, Gargon, Elizabeth, Gorst, Sarah, Harman, Nicola, Kirkham, Jamie J., McNair, Angus, Prinsen, Cecilia A. C., Schmitt, Jochen, Terwee, Caroline B., Young, Bridget
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biomarkers
Biomedicine
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trial
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic - standards
COMET Initiative
Consensus
Core outcome set
Databases, Factual
Decision making
Endpoint Determination - standards
Evidence-Based Medicine - standards
Guideline Adherence - standards
Handbooks
Handbooks, vade-mecums, etc
Health Sciences
Humans
Intervention
Laboratories
Management
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Experimental
Outcome and process assessment (Health Care)
Patients
Patients and the public
Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards
Records and correspondence
Research Design - standards
Review
Stakeholder Participation
Statistics for Life Sciences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!