Loading…

Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND:Technological advances can improve care and outcomes but are a primary driver of health care spending growth. Understanding diffusion and use of new oncology therapies is important, given substantial increases in prices and spending on such treatments. OBJECTIVES:Examine diffusion of beva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical care 2018-01, Vol.56 (1), p.69-77
Main Authors: Keating, Nancy L, Huskamp, Haiden A, Schrag, Deborah, McWilliams, John M, McNeil, Barbara J, Landon, Bruce E, Chernew, Michael E, Normand, Sharon-Lise T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND:Technological advances can improve care and outcomes but are a primary driver of health care spending growth. Understanding diffusion and use of new oncology therapies is important, given substantial increases in prices and spending on such treatments. OBJECTIVES:Examine diffusion of bevacizumab, a novel (in 2004) and high-priced biologic cancer therapy, among US oncology practices during 2005–2012 and assess variation in use across practices. RESEARCH DESIGN:Population-based observational study. SETTING:A total of 2329 US practices providing cancer chemotherapy. PARTICIPANTS:Random 20% sample of 236,304 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged above 65 years in 2004–2012 undergoing infused chemotherapy for cancer. MEASURES:Diffusion of bevacizumab (cumulative time to first use and 10% use) in practices, variation in use across practices overall and by higher versus lower-value use. We used hierarchical models with practice random effects to estimate the between-practice variation in the probability of receiving bevacizumab and to identify factors associated with use. RESULTS:We observed relatively rapid diffusion of bevacizumab, particularly in independent practices and larger versus smaller practices. We observed substantial variation in use; the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of bevacizumab use was 2.90 higher (2.73–3.08) for practices 1 SD above versus one standard deviation below the mean. Variation was less for higher-value [odds ratio=2.72 (2.56–2.89)] than lower-value uses [odds ratio=3.61 (3.21–4.06)]. CONCLUSIONS:Use of bevacizumab varied widely across oncology practices, particularly for lower-value indications. These findings suggest that interventions targeted to practices have potential for decreasing low-value use of high-cost cancer therapies.
ISSN:0025-7079
1537-1948
DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000840