Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: Spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis

• Published in: Arab Journal of Urology: Updates in Male Factor Infertility 2018-03, Vol.16 (1), p.181-187
• Main Authors: Al-Kandari, Ahmed M., Khudair, Abdulnasser, Arafa, Abdelghaffar, Zanaty, Fouad, Ezz, Ahmed, El-Shazly, Mohamed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Hydrocele; Management; Microscopic varicocelectomy; Recurrence; ultrasonography/ultrasound; Vascular anatomy
• ISSN: 2090-5998; 2090-598X; 2090-598X; 2090-5998
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.12.002

Objective: To evaluate the detailed vascular anatomy of the spermatic cord during subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy and to assess the outcome of the cases with regard to varicocele recurrence and hydrocele formation. Patients and methods: In all, 100 varicocele cases including 74 left-sided and 26 bilateral, comprising 126 spermatic cord units with clinically palpable varicoceles underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy. Detailed description of vascular anatomy of the spermatic cords was reported. The number of spermatic, cremasteric, and inguinal veins was recorded. A record of testicular arteries and lymphatics was noted. Testicular delivery was done in all the cases and assessment of the gubernacular veins was reported. The patients underwent clinical evaluation, as well as scrotal Doppler ultrasonography, to detect varicocele recurrence and hydrocele formation. The mean (range) postoperative evaluation period was 6 (3-12) months. Results: The mean number of spermatic veins was 14 on both sides. The mean number of spermatic arteries on both sides was 1.3. For lymphatics, the mean number was around three on both sides. The gubernacular veins were noted in 75% of the cases on the left side (mean number of 1.2) and in 85% on the right-side, (mean number of 1). The mean number of cremasteric veins on the left and right sides was 1.4 and 1.2, respectively. Finally, inguinal floor vessels were noted in 9% on the left-side and were not seen in the right-side cases. The incidence of varicocele recurrence was 2% and for hydrocele that was not clinically significant was 0.07%. Conclusion: Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy accurately evaluated the detailed vascular anatomy of the spermatic cord, achieving excellent surgical outcome with minimal varicocele recurrence and hydrocele formation. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy should be the 'gold standard' for varicocelectomy.