How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review

• Published in: British journal of sports medicine 2018-06, Vol.52 (12), p.776-788
• Main Authors: Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Han, Ho, Aguiar, Elroy J, Barreira, Tiago V, Schuna Jr, John M, Kang, Minsoo, Rowe, David A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aging; Clinical trials; Diabetes; Exercise; Health Behavior; Humans; Intervention; Joint surgery; Laboratories; Observational Studies as Topic; Older people; Physical fitness; Public health; Review; Search strategies; Studies; Walking; Walking Speed
• ISSN: 0306-3674; 1473-0480
• DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097628

BackgroundCadence (steps/min) may be a reasonable proxy-indicator of ambulatory intensity. A summary of current evidence is needed for cadence-based metrics supporting benchmark (standard or point of reference) and threshold (minimums associated with desired outcomes) values that are informed by a systematic process.ObjectiveTo review how fast, in terms of cadence, is enough, with reference to crafting public health recommendations in adults.MethodsA comprehensive search strategy was conducted to identify relevant studies focused on walking cadence and intensity for adults. Identified studies (n=38) included controlled (n=11), free-living observational (n=18) and intervention (n=9) designs.ResultsThere was a strong relationship between cadence (as measured by direct observation and objective assessments) and intensity (indirect calorimetry). Despite acknowledged interindividual variability, ≥100 steps/min is a consistent heuristic (e.g, evidence-based, rounded) value associated with absolutely defined moderate intensity (3 metabolic equivalents (METs)). Epidemiological studies report notably low mean daily cadences (ie, 7.7 steps/min), shaped primarily by the very large proportion of time (13.5 hours/day) spent between zero and purposeful cadences (100 and >70 steps/min, respectively. Peak cadence indicators are negatively associated with increased age and body mass index. Identified intervention studies used cadence to either prescribe and/or quantify ambulatory intensity but the evidence is best described as preliminary.ConclusionsA cadence value of ≥100 steps/min in adults appears to be a consistent and reasonable heuristic answer to ’How fast is fast enough?' during sustained and rhythmic ambulatory behaviour.Trial registration numberNCT02650258