Serial FLT PET imaging to discriminate between true progression and pseudoprogression in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a long-term follow-up study

• Published in: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2018-12, Vol.45 (13), p.2404-2412
• Main Authors: Brahm, Cyrillo G., den Hollander, Martha W., Enting, Roelien H., de Groot, Jan Cees, Solouki, A. Millad, den Dunnen, Wilfred F. A., Heesters, Mart A. A. M., Wagemakers, Michiel, Verheul, Henk M. W., de Vries, Elisabeth G. E., Pruim, Jan, Walenkamp, Annemiek M. E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brain cancer; Cardiology; Chemoradiotherapy; Glioblastoma; Imaging; Lesions; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Oncology; Original; Original Article; Orthopedics; Patients; Positron emission; Radiology; Survival; Temozolomide; Tomography; Tumors
• ISSN: 1619-7070; 1619-7089
• DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4090-4

Purpose Response evaluation in patients with glioblastoma after chemoradiotherapy is challenging due to progressive, contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI that do not reflect true tumour progression. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the ability of the PET tracer 18 F-fluorothymidine (FLT), a tracer reflecting proliferative activity, to discriminate between true progression and pseudoprogression in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Methods FLT PET and MRI scans were performed before and 4 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. MRI scans were also performed after three cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Pseudoprogression was defined as progressive disease on MRI after chemoradiotherapy with stabilisation or reduction of contrast-enhanced lesions after three cycles of temozolomide, and was compared with the disease course during long-term follow-up. Changes in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) and tumour-to-normal uptake ratios were calculated for FLT and are presented as the mean SUV max for multiple lesions. Results Between 2009 and 2012, 30 patients were included. Of 24 evaluable patients, 7 showed pseudoprogression and 7 had true progression as defined by MRI response. FLT PET parameters did not significantly differ between patients with true progression and pseudoprogression defined by MRI. The correlation between change in SUV max and survival ( p  = 0.059) almost reached the standard level of statistical significance. Lower baseline FLT PET uptake was significantly correlated with improved survival ( p  = 0.022). Conclusion Baseline FLT uptake appears to be predictive of overall survival. Furthermore, changes in SUV max over time showed a tendency to be associated with improved survival. However, further studies are necessary to investigate the ability of FLT PET imaging to discriminate between true progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.