Loading…

Adolescent decision-making in Canadian medical contexts: Integrating neuroscience and consent frameworks

The primary objective of this commentary is to integrate current neuroscientific research on brain development during adolescence, with existing consent frameworks that do not designate a minimum age for eligibility to consent to, or refuse medical treatment. To reach this objective, the three conse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Paediatrics & child health 2018-09, Vol.23 (6), p.374-376
Main Authors: Schwartz, Yael, Williams, Tricia S, Roberts, Samantha D, Hellmann, Jonathan, Zlotnik Shaul, Randi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The primary objective of this commentary is to integrate current neuroscientific research on brain development during adolescence, with existing consent frameworks that do not designate a minimum age for eligibility to consent to, or refuse medical treatment. To reach this objective, the three consent frameworks used in health care settings are outlined: age-based framework; mature minor framework and capacity-based framework. This commentary draws on the Canadian health care system specifically to consider consent frameworks that grant young people with decision-making capacity. Next, a brief review of adolescent brain development findings is presented, particularly pertaining to the decision-making capacity of young people within medical contexts. Ultimately, the question of whether the stage of a young person's brain development impedes their capacity to consent to, or refuse medical treatment is addressed. This commentary provides reassurance as to the compatibility between capacity-based and mature minor frameworks to consent to treatment with current neuroscientific understanding of adolescent brain development.
ISSN:1205-7088
1918-1485
DOI:10.1093/pch/pxy037