Loading…

Safety and clinical performance of a drug eluting absorbable metal scaffold in the treatment of subjects with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries: Pooled 12‐month outcomes of BIOSOLVE‐II and BIOSOLVE‐III

Objectives Based on outcomes of the BIOSOLVE‐II study, a novel second generation drug‐eluting absorbable metal scaffold gained CE‐mark in 2016. The BIOSOLVE‐III study aimed to confirm these outcomes and to obtain additional 12‐month angiographic data. Background Bioresorbable scaffolds are intended...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2018-12, Vol.92 (7), p.E502-E511
Main Authors: Haude, Michael, Ince, Hüseyin, Kische, Stephan, Abizaid, Alexandre, Tölg, Ralph, Alves Lemos, Pedro, Van Mieghem, Nicolas M., Verheye, Stefan, von Birgelen, Clemens, Christiansen, Evald Høj, Barbato, Emanuele, Garcia‐Garcia, Hector M., Waksman, Ron
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives Based on outcomes of the BIOSOLVE‐II study, a novel second generation drug‐eluting absorbable metal scaffold gained CE‐mark in 2016. The BIOSOLVE‐III study aimed to confirm these outcomes and to obtain additional 12‐month angiographic data. Background Bioresorbable scaffolds are intended to overcome possible long‐term effects of permanent stents such as chronic vessel wall inflammation, stent crushing, and fractures. Methods The prospective, multicenter BIOSOLVE‐II and BIOSOLVE‐III studies enrolled 184 patients with 189 lesions (123 patients in BIOSOLVE‐II and 61 patients in BIOSOLVE‐III). Primary endpoints were in‐segment late lumen loss at 6 months (BIOSOLVE‐II) and procedural success (BIOSOLVE‐III). Results Mean patient age was 65.5 ± 10.8 years and mean lesion reference diameter was 2.70 ± 0.43 mm. In BIOSOLVE‐III, there were significantly more type B2/C lesions than in BIOSOLVE‐II (80.3% versus 43.4%, P 
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.27680