Loading…
Amiodarone in restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after unsuccessful direct‐current cardioversion
Background: When direct‐current (DC) cardioversion is used, sinus rhythm can be restored, at least temporarily, in 80–90% of patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is a small but significant group of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation in whom DC cardioversion has failed to restore...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical cardiology (Mahwah, N.J.) N.J.), 1997-04, Vol.20 (4), p.337-340 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: When direct‐current (DC) cardioversion is used, sinus rhythm can be restored, at least temporarily, in 80–90% of patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is a small but significant group of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation in whom DC cardioversion has failed to restore sinus rhythm. The value of antiarrhythmic drug pretreatment before DC cardioversion is still controversial.
Hypothesis: The aim of our study was to assess (1) the effecti veness of repeat DC cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after pretreatment with amiodarone, and (2) the efficacy of amiodarone in maintaining sinus rhythm after repeat cardioversion.
Methods: Forty‐nine patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after ineffective DC cardioversion were included in the study. Repeat DC cardioversion was performed after loading with oral amiodarone, 10–15 mg/kg body weight/day for a period necessary to achieve the cumulative dose of over 6.0 g.
Results: Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm during amiodarone pretreatment was achieved in 9 of 49 patients (18%). Direct‐current cardioversion was performed in 39 patients and sinus rhythm was achieved in 23 of these patients (59%). Mean heart rate decreased from 95 beats/min before to 68 beats/min after DC cardioversion (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0160-9289 1932-8737 |
DOI: | 10.1002/clc.4960200407 |