Establishing Psychological Safety to Obtain Feedback for Training Programs: A Novel Cross-Specialty Focus Group Exchange

• Published in: Journal of graduate medical education 2019-08, Vol.11 (4), p.454-459
• Main Authors: Saddawi-Konefka, Daniel, Scott-Vernaglia, Shannon E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesiology - education; Education, Medical, Graduate; Educational Innovation; Focus Groups; Formative Feedback; Humans; Internship and Residency; Pediatrics - education; Physicians - psychology; Program Evaluation - trends; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1949-8349; 1949-8357
• DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00038.1

Formative feedback from residents is essential to improve residency programs, and focus groups may provide rich information. However, residents may withhold information due to fear of retaliation or speak less candidly to please focus group moderators. We assessed participant perceptions and utility of feedback obtained from a confidential focus group exchange between 2 residency programs. Anesthesiology and pediatric programs at the same institution participated in 2017. Residents voluntarily provided program feedback during 1 of 2 confidential focus groups for each program. Each focus group was moderated by the program director (PD) of the other specialty. The PDs used thematic analysis to identify themes for use by the respective programs in improvement efforts. An anonymous survey was distributed after the focus groups to collect participant perceptions (quantitative and narrative) on this approach. Thirteen residents of 140 (9.3%) participated (7 anesthesiology, 6 pediatrics). Thematic feedback from focus groups was largely consistent with known issues, although novel information was also obtained (eg, pediatric interns wanted earlier one-on-one meetings with their PD). Survey data suggest that residents were able to share more meaningful feedback than they would otherwise, and they did not feel that having an external moderator (a PD who may have been unfamiliar with the specialty) was a barrier to discussion. The approach required 6 hours of time for each PD and approximately $200 for dinners. The focus group exchange required modest resources, was perceived as safe by residents, and generated robust, actionable feedback for the programs.