The effect of preventive use of corticosteroids on postoperative complications after esophagectomy: A retrospective cohort study

• Published in: Scientific reports 2019-08, Vol.9 (1), p.11984-9, Article 11984
• Main Authors: Jeong, Heejoon, Choi, Ji Won, Ahn, Hyun Joo, Choi, Yong Soo, Kim, Jie Ae, Yang, Mikyung, Kim, Jin Kyoung, Kim, Duk Kyung, Shin, Byung Seop, Lee, Sang Hyun, Kim, Young Ri, Park, Mihye, Chung, Yoon Joo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/499; 692/699/67/1504/1477; Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration & dosage; Aged; Cohort analysis; Corticoids; Corticosteroids; Dehiscence; Esophageal Neoplasms - complications; Esophagectomy - adverse effects; Esophagectomy - methods; Esophagus; Gastrointestinal surgery; Graft-versus-host reaction; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Incidence; Infections; Middle Aged; multidisciplinary; Odds Ratio; Patients; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control; Propensity Score; Respiration; Respiratory distress syndrome; Respiratory Distress Syndrome - etiology; Respiratory Distress Syndrome - prevention & control; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Steroids; Surgery
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48349-0

Corticosteroids have been empirically administered to reduce the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after esophagectomy. However, their efficacy remains controversial, and corticosteroids may increase the risk of graft dehiscence and infection, which are major concerns after esophagectomy. Therefore, we compared the incidence of composite complications (ARDS, graft dehiscence and infection) after esophagectomy between patients who received a preventive administration of corticosteroids and those who did not. All patients who underwent esophagectomy from 2010 to 2015 at a tertiary care university hospital were reviewed retrospectively ( n  = 980). Patients were divided into Steroid ( n  = 120) and Control ( n  = 860) groups based on the preventive administration of 100 mg hydrocortisone during surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of composite complications. The incidence of composite complications was not different between the Control and Steroid groups (17.4% vs. 21.7% respectively; P  = 0.26). The incidence rates of complications in each category were not different between the Control and Steroid groups: ARDS (3.8% vs. 5.0%; P  = 0.46), graft dehiscence (4.8% vs. 6.7%; P  = 0.37), and infection (12.8% vs. 15.8%; P  = 0.36). Propensity score matching revealed that composite complications (20.0% vs. 21.7%; P  = 0.75), ARDS (4.3% vs. 5.2%; P  = 0.76) and infection (16.5% vs. 15.7%; P  = 0.86) were not different between the Control and Steroid group, but the incidence of graft dehiscence was higher in the Steroid group than in the Control group (0.9% vs. 7.0%; P  = 0.0175). In conclusions, the preventive use of corticosteroids did not reduce the incidence of ARDS, but may be related to an increased incidence of graft dehiscence. Therefore, routine administration of corticosteroids to prevent ARDS is not recommended in esophagectomy.