Loading…
Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins
We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2005, Vol.19 (3), p.115-119 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603 |
container_end_page | 119 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Journal of clinical laboratory analysis |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Becker, Sven Becker-Pergola, Graziella Fehm, Tanja Emig, Robert Wallwiener, Diethelm Solomayer, Erich-Franz |
description | We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcla.20064 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6808033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67860218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotuFCw-AfOKAlDKOE8e5IFUrWgqrcgDE0XKcSeuSxFuPl5K3b5ZdClw4-eBv_vlHH2MvBJwIgPzNjevtSQ6gikdsIaDWWa7z8jFbgNZVpkHII3ZMdAMAuhbqKTsSZQ1QKr1geDHYK-R2tP1EnjhNlHAg3oXI0zXyFhO65MPIQ8dbT4SDH23CljcRLSXu7Ogwcod9T3zGmjBiNtgYwx13Uwq08SM9Y0862xM-P7xL9vXs3ZfV-2z96fxidbrOXFGqImsUSuXqAgEr51rsutxKKVE5YQuosdJlhSjzonU56hZaUVcKC1shdI1QIJfs7T53s20GbB2OKdrebKKfG00mWG_-_Rn9tbkKP4zSoGFetWSvDgEx3G6Rkhk87W6zI4YtGVVpBbnQM_h6D7oYiCJ2D0sEmJ0Vs7NiflmZ4Zd_1_qDHjTMgNgDd77H6T9R5sNqffo7NNvP-NnYz4cZG7_PLWVVmm-X5-as_PxRSH1plLwHdgGqBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67860218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Becker, Sven ; Becker-Pergola, Graziella ; Fehm, Tanja ; Emig, Robert ; Wallwiener, Diethelm ; Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Sven ; Becker-Pergola, Graziella ; Fehm, Tanja ; Emig, Robert ; Wallwiener, Diethelm ; Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-8013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15900568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biopsy, Needle ; Bone Marrow - pathology ; Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology ; Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; immunocytology ; immunohistochemistry ; micrometastases ; minimal residual disease ; occult tumor cells ; Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2005, Vol.19 (3), p.115-119</ispartof><rights>2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808033/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808033/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15900568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fehm, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emig, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwiener, Diethelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creatorcontrib><title>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</title><title>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Lab. Anal</addtitle><description>We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>immunocytology</subject><subject>immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>micrometastases</subject><subject>minimal residual disease</subject><subject>occult tumor cells</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>0887-8013</issn><issn>1098-2825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotuFCw-AfOKAlDKOE8e5IFUrWgqrcgDE0XKcSeuSxFuPl5K3b5ZdClw4-eBv_vlHH2MvBJwIgPzNjevtSQ6gikdsIaDWWa7z8jFbgNZVpkHII3ZMdAMAuhbqKTsSZQ1QKr1geDHYK-R2tP1EnjhNlHAg3oXI0zXyFhO65MPIQ8dbT4SDH23CljcRLSXu7Ogwcod9T3zGmjBiNtgYwx13Uwq08SM9Y0862xM-P7xL9vXs3ZfV-2z96fxidbrOXFGqImsUSuXqAgEr51rsutxKKVE5YQuosdJlhSjzonU56hZaUVcKC1shdI1QIJfs7T53s20GbB2OKdrebKKfG00mWG_-_Rn9tbkKP4zSoGFetWSvDgEx3G6Rkhk87W6zI4YtGVVpBbnQM_h6D7oYiCJ2D0sEmJ0Vs7NiflmZ4Zd_1_qDHjTMgNgDd77H6T9R5sNqffo7NNvP-NnYz4cZG7_PLWVVmm-X5-as_PxRSH1plLwHdgGqBg</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Becker, Sven</creator><creator>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</creator><creator>Fehm, Tanja</creator><creator>Emig, Robert</creator><creator>Wallwiener, Diethelm</creator><creator>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</title><author>Becker, Sven ; Becker-Pergola, Graziella ; Fehm, Tanja ; Emig, Robert ; Wallwiener, Diethelm ; Solomayer, Erich-Franz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>immunocytology</topic><topic>immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>micrometastases</topic><topic>minimal residual disease</topic><topic>occult tumor cells</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fehm, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emig, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwiener, Diethelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Sven</au><au>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</au><au>Fehm, Tanja</au><au>Emig, Robert</au><au>Wallwiener, Diethelm</au><au>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Lab. Anal</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>115-119</pages><issn>0887-8013</issn><eissn>1098-2825</eissn><abstract>We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15900568</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcla.20064</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-8013 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2005, Vol.19 (3), p.115-119 |
issn | 0887-8013 1098-2825 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6808033 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | Biopsy, Needle Bone Marrow - pathology Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary Breast Neoplasms - metabolism Breast Neoplasms - pathology Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation immunocytology immunohistochemistry micrometastases minimal residual disease occult tumor cells Original |
title | Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A18%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image%20analysis%20systems%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20disseminated%20breast%20cancer%20cells%20on%20bone-marrow%20cytospins&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20laboratory%20analysis&rft.au=Becker,%20Sven&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=115-119&rft.issn=0887-8013&rft.eissn=1098-2825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcla.20064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67860218%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67860218&rft_id=info:pmid/15900568&rfr_iscdi=true |