Loading…

Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins

We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2005, Vol.19 (3), p.115-119
Main Authors: Becker, Sven, Becker-Pergola, Graziella, Fehm, Tanja, Emig, Robert, Wallwiener, Diethelm, Solomayer, Erich-Franz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603
container_end_page 119
container_issue 3
container_start_page 115
container_title Journal of clinical laboratory analysis
container_volume 19
creator Becker, Sven
Becker-Pergola, Graziella
Fehm, Tanja
Emig, Robert
Wallwiener, Diethelm
Solomayer, Erich-Franz
description We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcla.20064
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6808033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67860218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotuFCw-AfOKAlDKOE8e5IFUrWgqrcgDE0XKcSeuSxFuPl5K3b5ZdClw4-eBv_vlHH2MvBJwIgPzNjevtSQ6gikdsIaDWWa7z8jFbgNZVpkHII3ZMdAMAuhbqKTsSZQ1QKr1geDHYK-R2tP1EnjhNlHAg3oXI0zXyFhO65MPIQ8dbT4SDH23CljcRLSXu7Ogwcod9T3zGmjBiNtgYwx13Uwq08SM9Y0862xM-P7xL9vXs3ZfV-2z96fxidbrOXFGqImsUSuXqAgEr51rsutxKKVE5YQuosdJlhSjzonU56hZaUVcKC1shdI1QIJfs7T53s20GbB2OKdrebKKfG00mWG_-_Rn9tbkKP4zSoGFetWSvDgEx3G6Rkhk87W6zI4YtGVVpBbnQM_h6D7oYiCJ2D0sEmJ0Vs7NiflmZ4Zd_1_qDHjTMgNgDd77H6T9R5sNqffo7NNvP-NnYz4cZG7_PLWVVmm-X5-as_PxRSH1plLwHdgGqBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67860218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Becker, Sven ; Becker-Pergola, Graziella ; Fehm, Tanja ; Emig, Robert ; Wallwiener, Diethelm ; Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Sven ; Becker-Pergola, Graziella ; Fehm, Tanja ; Emig, Robert ; Wallwiener, Diethelm ; Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-8013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20064</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15900568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biopsy, Needle ; Bone Marrow - pathology ; Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology ; Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; immunocytology ; immunohistochemistry ; micrometastases ; minimal residual disease ; occult tumor cells ; Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2005, Vol.19 (3), p.115-119</ispartof><rights>2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808033/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6808033/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15900568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fehm, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emig, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwiener, Diethelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creatorcontrib><title>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</title><title>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Lab. Anal</addtitle><description>We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>immunocytology</subject><subject>immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>micrometastases</subject><subject>minimal residual disease</subject><subject>occult tumor cells</subject><subject>Original</subject><issn>0887-8013</issn><issn>1098-2825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotuFCw-AfOKAlDKOE8e5IFUrWgqrcgDE0XKcSeuSxFuPl5K3b5ZdClw4-eBv_vlHH2MvBJwIgPzNjevtSQ6gikdsIaDWWa7z8jFbgNZVpkHII3ZMdAMAuhbqKTsSZQ1QKr1geDHYK-R2tP1EnjhNlHAg3oXI0zXyFhO65MPIQ8dbT4SDH23CljcRLSXu7Ogwcod9T3zGmjBiNtgYwx13Uwq08SM9Y0862xM-P7xL9vXs3ZfV-2z96fxidbrOXFGqImsUSuXqAgEr51rsutxKKVE5YQuosdJlhSjzonU56hZaUVcKC1shdI1QIJfs7T53s20GbB2OKdrebKKfG00mWG_-_Rn9tbkKP4zSoGFetWSvDgEx3G6Rkhk87W6zI4YtGVVpBbnQM_h6D7oYiCJ2D0sEmJ0Vs7NiflmZ4Zd_1_qDHjTMgNgDd77H6T9R5sNqffo7NNvP-NnYz4cZG7_PLWVVmm-X5-as_PxRSH1plLwHdgGqBg</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Becker, Sven</creator><creator>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</creator><creator>Fehm, Tanja</creator><creator>Emig, Robert</creator><creator>Wallwiener, Diethelm</creator><creator>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</title><author>Becker, Sven ; Becker-Pergola, Graziella ; Fehm, Tanja ; Emig, Robert ; Wallwiener, Diethelm ; Solomayer, Erich-Franz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>immunocytology</topic><topic>immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>micrometastases</topic><topic>minimal residual disease</topic><topic>occult tumor cells</topic><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fehm, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emig, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallwiener, Diethelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Sven</au><au>Becker-Pergola, Graziella</au><au>Fehm, Tanja</au><au>Emig, Robert</au><au>Wallwiener, Diethelm</au><au>Solomayer, Erich-Franz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Lab. Anal</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>115-119</pages><issn>0887-8013</issn><eissn>1098-2825</eissn><abstract>We assessed the accuracy of automated cell imaging systems when compared to manual evaluation of cytospin slides in determining the presence of cytokeratin‐positive, disseminated breast cancer cells in bone marrow aspirates. A total of 298 cytospin slides of bone marrow aspirates were first evaluated by individual screening by one expert immunocytologist. Subsequently, all 298 slides were evaluated by the Automated Cell Imaging System (ACIS) by ChromaVision™. Two separate analysis cycles were performed using ACIS. The results of the two ACIS analysis cycles were almost identical: in 293 out of 298 samples (98.3%), identical numbers of disseminated breast cancer cells were detected. In the remaining five samples (1.7%), the result of the two ACIS analysis cycles differed by only one tumor cell. By using the manual technique, 120 cytospin samples were found to be positive. ACIS was able to detect additional tumor cells in 64 cases. Not once did ACIS miss tumor cells when compared to the manual technique. Using ACIS, we were able to determine the bone marrow status of patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer faster, with greater accuracy, and with greater reproducibility than with the manual technique. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 19:115–119, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>15900568</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcla.20064</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-8013
ispartof Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2005, Vol.19 (3), p.115-119
issn 0887-8013
1098-2825
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6808033
source PubMed Central
subjects Biopsy, Needle
Bone Marrow - pathology
Bone Marrow Neoplasms - pathology
Bone Marrow Neoplasms - secondary
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
immunocytology
immunohistochemistry
micrometastases
minimal residual disease
occult tumor cells
Original
title Image analysis systems for the detection of disseminated breast cancer cells on bone-marrow cytospins
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A18%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image%20analysis%20systems%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20disseminated%20breast%20cancer%20cells%20on%20bone-marrow%20cytospins&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20laboratory%20analysis&rft.au=Becker,%20Sven&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=115-119&rft.issn=0887-8013&rft.eissn=1098-2825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcla.20064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67860218%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4564-b6e36c94e0e7ccdeff2a333e6c1a409e7857ee324dc2e8d0d1976e4a7e0fb1603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67860218&rft_id=info:pmid/15900568&rfr_iscdi=true