Performance evaluation of five commercial assays for detection of acetaminophen

• Published in: Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2019-02, Vol.33 (2), p.e22683-n/a
• Main Authors: Chan, Bao‐Yum, Tsang, Hing‐Man, Ng, Candy Wai‐Yan, Ling, William Hin‐Wing, Leung, Daniel Cheuk‐Wa, Lee, Hencher Han‐Chih, Mak, Chloe Miu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acetaminophen; Acetaminophen - blood; Acetaminophen - chemistry; Acetylcysteine; Acetylcysteine - chemistry; Analgesics; Bias; Bilirubin; Bilirubin - chemistry; enzymatic assay; evaluation; Hemolysis; Humans; Immunoassay; Immunoenzyme Techniques - methods; Immunoenzyme Techniques - standards; Linear Models; Paracetamol; Quality assurance; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrafiltration
• ISSN: 0887-8013; 1098-2825
• DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22683

Background To evaluate the analytical performance of five commercial acetaminophen assays and select the best method for routine use. Methods Imprecision, accuracy, linearity, and interferences of three enzymatic assays (Beckman Coulter AU Paracetamol, Abbott MULTIGENT Acetaminophen, and Sekisui Acetaminophen L3K) and two immunoassay‐based assays (Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON ACTM (Acetaminophen) Reagent and Siemens SYVA Emit‐tox Acetaminophen) were evaluated on a Beckman Coulter AU680 chemistry analyzer. Hook effect for immunoassay‐based assays and recovery in ultrafiltrate for enzymatic methods were studied. Results Within‐run and between‐run imprecision of the enzymatic assays ranged 0.26%‐0.82% and 0.53%‐2.86%, respectively, while that for the immunoassay‐based methods ranged 0.96%‐6.34% and 1.50%‐11.33%, respectively. All assays except the SYNCHRON assay fell within the program analytical performance specifications (±20 µmol/L or 10%) for external quality assurance (EQA) samples, with the highest positive bias (31.7%) observed in the SYNCHRON assay. Icteric interference was demonstrated most significantly in the Abbott assay (up to 88 μmol/L positive bias in blank serum). The lipemic interference on the SYNCHRON was significant (up to 110% positive bias at level of 100 μmol/L). The immunoassay‐based methods were less susceptible to hemolytic interference, while the Abbott and AU assays were more susceptible to N‐acetylcysteine interference. Both immunoassay‐based methods showed no hook effect up to 18 000 μmol/L. Ultrafiltration recoveries for enzymatic methods were satisfactory, ranging from 80.0% ± 5.1% to 89.5% ± 3.0%. Conclusions Proportional bias was observed in the SYNCHRON assay, while the Siemens and Sekisui assays were minimally affected by bilirubin interferences.