Shoulder Pain and Rotational Range of Motion of the Trunk, Shoulder, and Hip in Baseball Players

• Published in: Journal of athletic training 2019-11, Vol.54 (11), p.1149-1155
• Main Authors: Kim, Yeol-Oh, Jo, Yoon-Ju, Kim, Si-Hyun, Park, Kyue-Nam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accident Prevention; Adaptation, Physiological; Adolescent; Baseball - physiology; Case-Control Studies; Compensation; Correlation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Error of Measurement; Examiners; High school baseball; Hip joint; Hip Joint - physiology; Humans; Injuries; Male; Measurement techniques; Pain; Range of motion; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology; Resistance (Psychology); Risk Factors; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint - physiology; Shoulder Pain - physiopathology; Sports injuries; Team Sports; Torso - physiology
• ISSN: 1062-6050; 1938-162X
• DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-203-18

Deficient glenohumeral rotational range of motion (ROM) is a risk factor for shoulder pain. Adapted ROM of the trunk and hip in response to loss of glenohumeral ROM has been suggested, as the nature of baseball leads to ROM adaptations. To compare the bilateral rotational ROM values of the trunk and glenohumeral and hip joints in adolescent baseball players with or without shoulder pain and to measure the correlation between shoulder-pain intensity and bilateral rotational ROM values for each body area. Cross-sectional study. Research laboratory. Ninety-five adolescent baseball players (60 with shoulder pain, 35 without shoulder pain). Bilateral trunk rotation and internal rotation, external rotation, and total rotation of the dominant and nondominant glenohumeral and hip joints. Glenohumeral and hip ROM did not differ between groups, and pain intensity and rotational ROM were not related in either joint. Trunk rotational ROM was greater in the pain group than in the control group (dominant side = 48.8° ± 14.2° versus 41.8° ± 11.9°, respectively; nondominant side = 45.1° ± 14.2° versus 38.9° ± 7.7°, respectively; values < .05), although the difference was clinically small (mean differences = 7.0° ± 2.7° [95% confidence interval = 1.7, 12.4] on the dominant side, = .01, and 6.1° ± 2.7° [95% confidence interval = 0.8, 11.5] on the nondominant side, = .03). Positive but low correlations in all players (ρ = 0.27, = .01) and in those with shoulder pain (ρ = 0.36, = .001) were present between shoulder-pain intensity and trunk rotational ROM toward the dominant side. We found no clinical relationship between shoulder pain and rotational ROM and no clinical differences in rotational ROM values between players with and those without shoulder pain.