Loading…

PRSS contributes to cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer

Cetuximab improves the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The main limitation is primary and secondary resistance, the underlying mechanism of which requires extensive investigation. We proved that PRSS expression levels are significantly negatively associated with the sensitivi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science advances 2020-01, Vol.6 (1), p.eaax5576-eaax5576
Main Authors: Tan, Zhaoli, Gao, Lihua, Wang, Yan, Yin, Huihui, Xi, Yongyi, Wu, Xiaojie, Shao, Yong, Qiu, Weiyi, Du, Peng, Shen, Wenlong, Fu, Ling, Jia, Ru, Zhao, Chuanhua, Zhang, Yun, Zhao, Zhihu, Sun, Zhiwei, Chen, Hongxing, Hu, Xianwen, Xu, Jianming, Wang, Youliang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cetuximab improves the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The main limitation is primary and secondary resistance, the underlying mechanism of which requires extensive investigation. We proved that PRSS expression levels are significantly negatively associated with the sensitivity of cancer cells to cetuximab. Detailed mechanistic analysis indicated that PRSS can cleave cetuximab, leading to resistance. Cetuximab or bevacizumab combined with SPINK1, a PRSS inhibitor, inhibited cell growth more efficiently than cetuximab or bevacizumab alone in xenograft models. PRSS levels in the serum of 156 patients with mCRC were analyzed, and poor efficacy of cetuximab therapy was observed in patients with aberrant PRSS expression. PRSS expression in monoclonal antibody (mAb)-treated patients with cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas database was also evaluated to determine whether patients with higher PRSS expression have significantly reduced progression-free survival. Our work provides a strong scientific rationale for targeting PRSS in combination with cetuximab therapy.
ISSN:2375-2548
2375-2548
DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aax5576