Comparison of first-year grade point average and national board scores between alternative admission track students in a chiropractic program who took or did not take preadmission science courses

• Published in: The Journal of chiropractic education 2020-03, Vol.34 (1), p.4-7
• Main Authors: Manrique, Carissa J, Giggleman, Gene
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Contributed Papers
• ISSN: 1042-5055; 2374-250X
• DOI: 10.7899/JCE-17-29

We compared first-year cumulative grade point average and a composite score on part I of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners (NBCE) exam for first-year alternative admission track program (AATP) students who did and did not take three specific undergraduate courses: general chemistry, organic chemistry, and anatomy and physiology. All AATP students in 2015 ( = 50) were evaluated for the course history of general chemistry and anatomy and physiology compared to their first-year cumulative grade point average and NBCE part 1 scores using independent -tests. Students in the AATP who took general chemistry tended to score higher overall on the NBCE exams ( = .038, = .229). Organic chemistry and anatomy and physiology had no statistical effect on improving board scores. First-year cumulative grade point average seemed to be unaffected by any of the undergraduate courses evaluated. There was a statistically significant difference in composite NBCE part 1 score between AATP students who had and had not taken general chemistry 1 before admission. There were no differences in first-year GPA between AATP students who had and had not taken undergraduate chemistry and A&P courses.