From silos to buckets: a qualitative study of how sexual health clinics address their clients’ mental health needs

• Published in: Canadian journal of public health 2020-04, Vol.111 (2), p.220-228
• Main Authors: Black, Stéphanie, Salway, Travis, Dove, Naomi, Shoveller, Jean, Gilbert, Mark
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: British Columbia; Buckets; Clients; Clinics; Constraints; Delivery of Health Care; Familiarity; Health care access; Health Personnel; HIV; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Interviews as Topic; Medical personnel; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mental Health; Needs Assessment; Nurses; Physicians; Prejudice; Public Health; Qualitative Research; Reproductive health; Reproductive Health Services; Sexual disorders; Sexual health; Sexually transmitted diseases; STD; Substance use
• ISSN: 0008-4263; 1920-7476; 1920-7476
• DOI: 10.17269/s41997-019-00273-6

Objectives To describe the current constraints, facilitators, and future prospects for addressing mental health and substance use (MHSU) concerns within sexual health clinics in two cities in British Columbia, Canada. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 22 providers (14 nurses, 3 physicians, 3 administrators, 2 other health professionals) from six sexual health clinics. Results Providers consistently affirmed that MHSU-related concerns co-occur with sexual health concerns among clients presenting to sexual health clinics. Three factors constrained the providers’ abilities to effectively address MHSU service needs: (1) clinic mandates or funding models (specific to sexually transmitted infections (STI)/HIV or reproductive health); (2) “siloing” (i.e., physical and administrative separation) of services; and (3) limited familiarity with MHSU service referral pathways. Mental health stigma was an additional provider-perceived barrier for sexual health clinic clients. The low barrier, “safe” nature of sexual health clinics, however, facilitated the ability of clients to open up about MHSU concerns, while the acquired experiences of sexual health nurses in counselling enabled clinicians to address clients’ MHSU needs. In response to this context, participants described actionable solutions, specifically co-location of sexual health and MHSU services. Conclusion Sexual health clinicians in British Columbia generally affirm the results of previous quantitative and client-focused research showing high rates of MHSU-related needs among sexual health clinic clients. Providers prioritized specific short-term (referral-focused) and long-term (healthcare re-organization, co-location of sexual and MHSU services) solutions for improving access to MHSU services for those using sexual health services.