Loading…

Deep learning risk assessment models for predicting progression of radiographic medial joint space loss over a 48-MONTH follow-up period

To develop and evaluate deep learning (DL) risk assessment models for predicting the progression of radiographic medial joint space loss using baseline knee X-rays. Knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative without and with progression of radiographic joint space loss (defined as ≥ 0.7 mm decrease in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2020-04, Vol.28 (4), p.428-437
Main Authors: Guan, B., Liu, F., Haj-Mirzaian, A., Demehri, S., Samsonov, A., Neogi, T., Guermazi, A., Kijowski, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To develop and evaluate deep learning (DL) risk assessment models for predicting the progression of radiographic medial joint space loss using baseline knee X-rays. Knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative without and with progression of radiographic joint space loss (defined as ≥ 0.7 mm decrease in medial joint space width measurement between baseline and 48-month follow-up X-rays) were randomly stratified into training (1400 knees) and hold-out testing (400 knees) datasets. A DL network was trained to predict the progression of radiographic joint space loss using the baseline knee X-rays. An artificial neural network was used to develop a traditional model for predicting progression utilizing demographic and radiographic risk factors. A combined joint training model was developed using a DL network to extract information from baseline knee X-rays as a feature vector, which was further concatenated with the risk factor data vector. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed using the hold-out test dataset to evaluate model performance. The traditional model had an AUC of 0.660 (61.5% sensitivity and 64.0% specificity) for predicting progression. The DL model had an AUC of 0.799 (78.0% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity), which was significantly higher (P 
ISSN:1063-4584
1522-9653
DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.010