Loading…
Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness
The rapid embracing of artificial intelligence in psychiatry has a flavor of being the current "wild west"; a multidisciplinary approach that is very technical and complex, yet seems to produce findings that resonate. These studies are hard to review as the methods are often opaque and it...
Saved in:
Published in: | Schizophrenia bulletin 2020-01, Vol.46 (1), p.11-14 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3 |
container_end_page | 14 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Schizophrenia bulletin |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Chandler, Chelsea Foltz, Peter W Elvevåg, Brita |
description | The rapid embracing of artificial intelligence in psychiatry has a flavor of being the current "wild west"; a multidisciplinary approach that is very technical and complex, yet seems to produce findings that resonate. These studies are hard to review as the methods are often opaque and it is tricky to find the suitable combination of reviewers. This issue will only get more complex in the absence of a rigorous framework to evaluate such studies and thus nurture trustworthiness. Therefore, our paper discusses the urgency of the field to develop a framework with which to evaluate the complex methodology such that the process is done honestly, fairly, scientifically, and accurately. However, evaluation is a complicated process and so we focus on three issues, namely explainability, transparency, and generalizability, that are critical for establishing the viability of using artificial intelligence in psychiatry. We discuss how defining these three issues helps towards building a framework to ensure trustworthiness, but show how difficult definition can be, as the terms have different meanings in medicine, computer science, and law. We conclude that it is important to start the discussion such that there can be a call for policy on this and that the community takes extra care when reviewing clinical applications of such models.. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/schbul/sbz105 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7145638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333609827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1P3DAQxS1UBFvgyLX1sZcUO47tuIdKFYK20vJxWM6W7TjEbdahHge0_evr1QKiB2ukNz89z8xD6JSSz5QodgZusPN4BvYvJXwPLahseEUloe_QgvBWVFLQ5hC9B_hFCG2UqA_QIaOKUErIAvk7CPEeXxk3hOjx0psUt0KI-BY2RTQ5bb7g1eDxtfcdzhO-gGzsGGDABl8ms_ZPU_pdCJPx9ZzynDzgVZohFz1vXQGO0X5vRvAnz_UI3V1erM5_VMub7z_Pvy0r11Caq1aRvryasI7YzltLW1EL1TveOC5bq3gjO2eNsNaVVWSnai7qsrDlje-JZUfo6873YbZr3zkfczKjfkhhbdJGTybo_zsxDPp-etSSNlywthh83Bm4FCCHqOOUjC6XYlLXRFFViE_PX6Tpz-wh63UA58fRRD_NoGvGmCCqrWVBqxezCSD5_nUQSvQ2PL0LT-_CK_yHt9O_0i9psX8EI5gZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333609827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Chandler, Chelsea ; Foltz, Peter W ; Elvevåg, Brita</creator><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Chelsea ; Foltz, Peter W ; Elvevåg, Brita</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid embracing of artificial intelligence in psychiatry has a flavor of being the current "wild west"; a multidisciplinary approach that is very technical and complex, yet seems to produce findings that resonate. These studies are hard to review as the methods are often opaque and it is tricky to find the suitable combination of reviewers. This issue will only get more complex in the absence of a rigorous framework to evaluate such studies and thus nurture trustworthiness. Therefore, our paper discusses the urgency of the field to develop a framework with which to evaluate the complex methodology such that the process is done honestly, fairly, scientifically, and accurately. However, evaluation is a complicated process and so we focus on three issues, namely explainability, transparency, and generalizability, that are critical for establishing the viability of using artificial intelligence in psychiatry. We discuss how defining these three issues helps towards building a framework to ensure trustworthiness, but show how difficult definition can be, as the terms have different meanings in medicine, computer science, and law. We conclude that it is important to start the discussion such that there can be a call for policy on this and that the community takes extra care when reviewing clinical applications of such models..</description><identifier>ISSN: 0586-7614</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-1701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbz105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31901100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>At Issue ; Clinical medical disciplines: 750 ; Humans ; Klinisk medisinske fag: 750 ; Machine Learning ; Medical disciplines: 700 ; Medisinske Fag: 700 ; Models, Theoretical ; Psychiatry - methods ; Psychiatry - standards ; Psychiatry, child psychiatry: 757 ; Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757 ; VDP</subject><ispartof>Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020-01, Vol.46 (1), p.11-14</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9409-0937</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145638/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145638/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,26567,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31901100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foltz, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvevåg, Brita</creatorcontrib><title>Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness</title><title>Schizophrenia bulletin</title><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><description>The rapid embracing of artificial intelligence in psychiatry has a flavor of being the current "wild west"; a multidisciplinary approach that is very technical and complex, yet seems to produce findings that resonate. These studies are hard to review as the methods are often opaque and it is tricky to find the suitable combination of reviewers. This issue will only get more complex in the absence of a rigorous framework to evaluate such studies and thus nurture trustworthiness. Therefore, our paper discusses the urgency of the field to develop a framework with which to evaluate the complex methodology such that the process is done honestly, fairly, scientifically, and accurately. However, evaluation is a complicated process and so we focus on three issues, namely explainability, transparency, and generalizability, that are critical for establishing the viability of using artificial intelligence in psychiatry. We discuss how defining these three issues helps towards building a framework to ensure trustworthiness, but show how difficult definition can be, as the terms have different meanings in medicine, computer science, and law. We conclude that it is important to start the discussion such that there can be a call for policy on this and that the community takes extra care when reviewing clinical applications of such models..</description><subject>At Issue</subject><subject>Clinical medical disciplines: 750</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Klinisk medisinske fag: 750</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Medical disciplines: 700</subject><subject>Medisinske Fag: 700</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Psychiatry - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatry, child psychiatry: 757</subject><subject>Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757</subject><subject>VDP</subject><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1P3DAQxS1UBFvgyLX1sZcUO47tuIdKFYK20vJxWM6W7TjEbdahHge0_evr1QKiB2ukNz89z8xD6JSSz5QodgZusPN4BvYvJXwPLahseEUloe_QgvBWVFLQ5hC9B_hFCG2UqA_QIaOKUErIAvk7CPEeXxk3hOjx0psUt0KI-BY2RTQ5bb7g1eDxtfcdzhO-gGzsGGDABl8ms_ZPU_pdCJPx9ZzynDzgVZohFz1vXQGO0X5vRvAnz_UI3V1erM5_VMub7z_Pvy0r11Caq1aRvryasI7YzltLW1EL1TveOC5bq3gjO2eNsNaVVWSnai7qsrDlje-JZUfo6873YbZr3zkfczKjfkhhbdJGTybo_zsxDPp-etSSNlywthh83Bm4FCCHqOOUjC6XYlLXRFFViE_PX6Tpz-wh63UA58fRRD_NoGvGmCCqrWVBqxezCSD5_nUQSvQ2PL0LT-_CK_yHt9O_0i9psX8EI5gZ</recordid><startdate>20200104</startdate><enddate>20200104</enddate><creator>Chandler, Chelsea</creator><creator>Foltz, Peter W</creator><creator>Elvevåg, Brita</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-0937</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200104</creationdate><title>Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness</title><author>Chandler, Chelsea ; Foltz, Peter W ; Elvevåg, Brita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>At Issue</topic><topic>Clinical medical disciplines: 750</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Klinisk medisinske fag: 750</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Medical disciplines: 700</topic><topic>Medisinske Fag: 700</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Psychiatry - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatry, child psychiatry: 757</topic><topic>Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757</topic><topic>VDP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chandler, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foltz, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elvevåg, Brita</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chandler, Chelsea</au><au>Foltz, Peter W</au><au>Elvevåg, Brita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness</atitle><jtitle>Schizophrenia bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Schizophr Bull</addtitle><date>2020-01-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0586-7614</issn><issn>1745-1701</issn><eissn>1745-1701</eissn><abstract>The rapid embracing of artificial intelligence in psychiatry has a flavor of being the current "wild west"; a multidisciplinary approach that is very technical and complex, yet seems to produce findings that resonate. These studies are hard to review as the methods are often opaque and it is tricky to find the suitable combination of reviewers. This issue will only get more complex in the absence of a rigorous framework to evaluate such studies and thus nurture trustworthiness. Therefore, our paper discusses the urgency of the field to develop a framework with which to evaluate the complex methodology such that the process is done honestly, fairly, scientifically, and accurately. However, evaluation is a complicated process and so we focus on three issues, namely explainability, transparency, and generalizability, that are critical for establishing the viability of using artificial intelligence in psychiatry. We discuss how defining these three issues helps towards building a framework to ensure trustworthiness, but show how difficult definition can be, as the terms have different meanings in medicine, computer science, and law. We conclude that it is important to start the discussion such that there can be a call for policy on this and that the community takes extra care when reviewing clinical applications of such models..</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31901100</pmid><doi>10.1093/schbul/sbz105</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-0937</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0586-7614 |
ispartof | Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020-01, Vol.46 (1), p.11-14 |
issn | 0586-7614 1745-1701 1745-1701 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7145638 |
source | PubMed Central Free; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | At Issue Clinical medical disciplines: 750 Humans Klinisk medisinske fag: 750 Machine Learning Medical disciplines: 700 Medisinske Fag: 700 Models, Theoretical Psychiatry - methods Psychiatry - standards Psychiatry, child psychiatry: 757 Psykiatri, barnepsykiatri: 757 VDP |
title | Using Machine Learning in Psychiatry: The Need to Establish a Framework That Nurtures Trustworthiness |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A53%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Machine%20Learning%20in%20Psychiatry:%20The%20Need%20to%20Establish%20a%20Framework%20That%20Nurtures%20Trustworthiness&rft.jtitle=Schizophrenia%20bulletin&rft.au=Chandler,%20Chelsea&rft.date=2020-01-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0586-7614&rft.eissn=1745-1701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/schbul/sbz105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2333609827%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-890f890203d0bdebb186269fc54c578b9547dcba6bbc1497d92562745b54ef0b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333609827&rft_id=info:pmid/31901100&rfr_iscdi=true |