Loading…

The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study

Purpose While most patients with wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography, around 50% of these radiographs show no fracture. To avoid unnecessary radiographs, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) have previously been developed and validated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2020-06, Vol.46 (3), p.573-582
Main Authors: Mulders, Marjolein A. M., Walenkamp, Monique M. J., Sosef, Nico L., Ouwehand, Frank, van Velde, Romuald, Goslings, Carel, Schep, Niels W. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose While most patients with wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography, around 50% of these radiographs show no fracture. To avoid unnecessary radiographs, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) have previously been developed and validated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the AWR at the Emergency Department (ED). Methods In a before-and-after comparative prospective cohort study, all consecutive adult patients with acute wrist trauma presenting at the ED of four hospitals were included. Primary outcome was the number of wrist radiographs before and after implementation of the AWR. Secondary outcomes were the number of clinically relevant missed fractures, the overall length of stay in the ED, physician compliance regarding the AWR, and patient satisfaction and experience with the care received at the ED. Results A total of 402 patients were included. The absolute reduction in wrist radiographs after implementation was 15% ( p  
ISSN:1863-9933
1863-9941
DOI:10.1007/s00068-019-01194-2