Effect of wet/dry, fresh liquid, fermented whole diet liquid, and fermented cereal liquid feeding on feed microbial quality and growth in grow-finisher pigs

• Published in: Journal of animal science 2020-06, Vol.98 (6), p.1-15
• Main Authors: O’ Meara, Fiona M, Gardiner, Gillian E, O’ Doherty, John V, Clarke, David, Cummins, Wayne, Lawlor, Peadar G
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino acids; Animal Feed - analysis; Animal Feed - microbiology; Animal Feed - standards; Animals; Bacteria; Biodegradation; Cattle; Decarboxylation; Diet; Diet - veterinary; Digestibility; Dry matter; Edible Grain; Enterobacteriaceae; Ethanol; Feed conversion; Feed efficiency; Feeders; Feeding; Feeds; Female; Fermentation; Food Microbiology; Gastrointestinal Tract; Hogs; Hordeum - chemistry; Lactic acid; Lactic acid bacteria; Male; Microorganisms; Non Ruminant Nutrition; Organic matter; Physical growth; Slaughter; Studies; Swine; Triticum - chemistry
• ISSN: 0021-8812; 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa166

Abstract Fermented liquid feeding has proved beneficial for weaner pigs; however, there is limited research on its effect on the growth and feed conversion efficiency (FCE) of grow-finisher pigs. Microbial decarboxylation of amino acids is associated with whole diet fermentation, while wet/dry and liquid feeding reportedly improve growth compared with dry feeding. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of wet/dry feeding and fresh, fermented whole diet, and fermented cereal liquid feeding on pig growth, feed efficiency, and carcass quality in grow-finisher pigs. Pigs were allocated to one of four dietary treatments in two experiments: 1) Single-space wet/dry feeders (WET/DRY), 2) Fresh liquid feeding (FRESH), 3) Fermented cereal liquid feeding where the cereal fraction (38% barley, 40% wheat) of the diet was fermented prior to feeding (FERM-CER), and 4) Fermented whole diet liquid feeding where the whole diet was fermented prior to feeding (FERM-WH). In exp. 1, pigs were fed the experimental diets for 68 d prior to slaughter (29.8 kg ± 0.92 SE to 102.3 kg ± 0.76 SE). Overall, average daily gain (ADG) was 1,094, 1,088, 1,110, and 955 g/d (SE = 13.0; P < 0.001) and FCE was 2.26, 2.37, 2.40, and 2.88 (SE = 0.031; P < 0.001) for treatments one through four, respectively. Pigs fed FERM-WH were lighter at slaughter than pigs fed the other three treatments (P < 0.001). In exp. 2, pigs were on treatment for 26 d prior to slaughter (85.3 kg ± 1.69 SE to 117.5 kg ± 0.72 SE). Overall, ADG in exp. 2 was 1,103, 1,217, 1,284, and 1,140 g/d (SE = 27.9; P < 0.01) and FCE was 2.78, 2.99, 2.95, and 3.09 g/g (SE = 0.071; P = 0.05), for treatments one through four, respectively. There were no significant differences observed between treatments for apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, nitrogen, gross energy, or ash. Higher lactic acid bacteria counts and lower Enterobacteriaceae counts and pH were observed in FERM-CER and FERM-WH compared with WET/DRY and FRESH. Ethanol concentrations were almost 4-fold higher in FERM-CER troughs than FRESH troughs and 5-fold higher in FERM-WH than FRESH troughs. To conclude, FERM-WH resulted in poorer growth and FCE compared with WET/DRY, FRESH, and FERM-CER, probably due to amino acid degradation and a loss in gross energy found in FERM-WH.