Effectiveness of Gelatin-Thrombin Matrix Sealants (Floseal®) on Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma during Single-Level Lumbar Decompression Using Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Image Study

• Published in: BioMed research international 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-10
• Main Authors: Yoo, Jun-Hyug, Park, Eugene J., Choi, Dae-Jung, Yoo, Hyun-Seung, Kim, Ju-Eun, Suh, Jeong-Duk, Hwang, Jin-Ho
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Back surgery; Bone surgery; Clinical outcomes; Compression; Compression tests; Decompression; Decompression, Surgical; Endoscopy; Epidural; Epidural hematoma; Evaluation; Female; Gelatin; Gelatin - pharmacology; Hematoma; Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal - diagnostic imaging; Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal - etiology; Humans; Leg; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Patients; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Reoperation; Resonance; Sealants; Spinal stenosis; Spine; Spine (lumbar); Statistical analysis; Statistical significance; Surgery; Thrombin; Thrombin - pharmacology; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 2314-6133; 2314-6141
• DOI: 10.1155/2020/4801641

Background. Symptomatic postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (PSEH) is a devastating complication that could develop after lumbar decompression surgery. PSEH can also develop after biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS), one of the recently introduced minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. Gelatin-thrombin matrix sealant (GTMS) is commonly used to prevent PSEH. This study aimed at analyzing the clinical and radiological effects of GTMS use during BESS. Methods. A total of 206 patients with spinal stenosis who underwent decompression by BESS through a posterior interlaminar approach from October 2015 to September 2018 were enrolled in this study. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all patients for evaluation of PSEH. Patients in whom GTMS was not used during surgery were assigned to Group A, and those in whom GTMS was used were classified as Group B. In the clinical evaluation, the visual analog scale (VAS) of the leg and back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria were used. The incidence rate and degree of dural compression of PSEH on postoperative MRI were measured. Results. The average age of the patients was 68.1±11.2 (42–89) years. The overall incidence rate of PSEH was 20.9% (43/206). The incidence rates in Groups A and B were 26.4% and 13.6%, respectively, showing a significant difference (p=0.023). The VAS-leg and ODI improvement was significantly different depending on the intraoperative use of GTMS. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the VAS-back improvement. Groups A and B showed “good” and “excellent” rates according to the modified MacNab criteria in 79.4% and 87.6% of patients, respectively, showing statistically significant difference (p=0.049). In Group A, two patients underwent revision surgery due to PSEH, while none in Group B had such event. Conclusion. Intraoperative use of GTMS during BESS may be related to reduction in the occurrence rate of PSEH. Specifically, patients with GTMS appliance showed marked decrease in the occurrence of PSEH and had better clinical outcomes.