The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on medical staff in Guangdong, China: a cross-sectional study

• Published in: Psychological Medicine 2022-04, Vol.52 (5), p.884-892
• Main Authors: Wang, Huajun, Huang, Daozheng, Huang, Huigen, Zhang, Jihui, Guo, Lan, Liu, Yuting, Ma, Huan, Geng, Qingshan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Anxiety - epidemiology; Anxiety - psychology; China - epidemiology; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demography; Depression - epidemiology; Depression - psychology; Health status; High risk; Hospitals; Humans; Insomnia; Medical Staff - psychology; Mental depression; Mental health; Original; Original Article; Pandemics; Psychological distress; Psychological well being; Risk groups; SARS-CoV-2; Severity; Sleep disorders; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders - epidemiology; Stress, Psychological - epidemiology; Stress, Psychological - psychology; Symptoms; Work experience
• ISSN: 0033-2917; 1469-8978
• DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720002561

During previous pandemic outbreaks, medical staff have reported high levels of psychological distress. The aim of the current study was to report a snapshot of the psychological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its correlated factors on medical staff in Guangdong, China. On the 2nd and 3rd February 2020, soon after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we surveyed medical staff at four hospitals in Guangdong, China, to collect demographic characteristics, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores. Complete responses were received from 1045 medical staff. Respondents were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to their working environment of contacting with potential or confirmed COVID-19 cases. The proportion of staff with anxiety (55.4% v. 43.0%, p < 0.001) or depression (43.6% v. 36.8%, p = 0.028) was significantly higher in the high-risk group than the low-risk group. The percentage of staff with severe anxiety was similar in the two groups. Doctors were more susceptible to moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms. The high-risk group had higher levels of clinical insomnia (13.5% v. 8.5%, p = 0.011) and were more likely to be in the upper quartile for stress symptoms (24.7% v. 19.3%, p = 0.037) than the low-risk group. Additionally, work experience negatively correlated with insomnia symptoms. It is important for hospitals and authorities to protect both the physical and psychological health of medical staff during times of pandemic, even those with a low exposure risk.