Loading…
Simple Post-Processing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measurements Improves Endpoints in Clinical Trials
Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a powerful tool to be considered both in clinical practice and clinical trials. However, CGM has been criticized for being inaccurate for many reasons including a physiological delay. This study sought to investigate the current delay issue and prop...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of diabetes science and technology 2020-11, Vol.14 (6), p.1074-1078 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background:
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a powerful tool to be considered both in clinical practice and clinical trials. However, CGM has been criticized for being inaccurate for many reasons including a physiological delay. This study sought to investigate the current delay issue and propose a simple post-processing procedure.
Method:
More than a million hours of the Dexcom G4 CGM from 472 subjects investigated in a state-of-the-art clinical trial were analyzed by time shifting the CGM measurements and comparing them to plasma glucose (PG) measurements. The resultant CGM measurements were then assessed in relation to real-world clinical research endpoints.
Results:
A CGM time shift of −9 minutes was optimal and reduced mean absolute relative difference (MARD) statistically significantly with 1.0% point. The MARD reduction resulted in better clinical research endpoints of hypoglycemia and postprandial glucose increments.
Conclusions:
The delay in CGM is still an issue. The delay in this study was identified to be 9 minutes compared to PG. With a simple post-processing approach of time shifting the CGM measurements with −9 minutes, it was possible to obtain a statistically significantly lower MARD and subsequently obtain clinical research endpoints of improved validity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1932-2968 1932-2968 1932-3107 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1932296819848721 |