Loading…
Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early‐stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy
Background To assess correlation of pretreatment specific growth rate (SGR) value of 0.43 × 10‐2 with overall and failure‐free survival of patients with early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods A retrospective chart review of 160...
Saved in:
Published in: | Thoracic cancer 2021-01, Vol.12 (2), p.201-209 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3 |
container_end_page | 209 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Thoracic cancer |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Atallah, Soha Le, Lisa W. Bezjak, Andrea MacRae, Robert Hope, Andrew J. Pantarotto, Jason |
description | Background
To assess correlation of pretreatment specific growth rate (SGR) value of 0.43 × 10‐2 with overall and failure‐free survival of patients with early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Methods
A retrospective chart review of 160 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between June 2010 and December 2012 in a large, tertiary cancer institute was undertaken. Both diagnostic and archived planning CT were uploaded to the treatment planning system to determine tumor volume at diagnosis (GTV1) and planning time (GTV2). The time (t) between both CTs was recorded. SGR was calculated using GTV1, GTV2, and t. The median SGR (0.43 × 10‐2) from our previous data was used to group patients into low and high SGR cohorts. Log‐rank test was used to compare overall (OS) and failure‐free survivals (FFS) of SGR groups.
Results
The median time interval between diagnostic and planning CT scans was 87 days. The median OS was 38 and 66 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.03). The median FFS was 27 and 55 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.005). High SGR (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1759-7714.13744 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7812066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478392276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1O3DAUhS1EBYiy7q6yxHrAv3GyQUIjaCshsYFuLce5mTFK4tRxGGXHA7DgGfskdRg6ghV3Y8s-9zv36iD0jZIzmuqcKlkslKLijHIlxB462r3s7-4kO0Qnw_BAUvG8IEweoEPOmcw5oUfo-bdpXGWi61bYtb2xEfsa9wFiABNb6CKOY-sDXgW_iWscTATsO-zHaH0LsxhMaKa_Ty9DNCvAzZhI1nQWAn5lQIU3LnUOEQL4mBycxaWvpsSqXHJOtLiGYPrpK_pSm2aAk7fzGN1fX90tfy5ubn_8Wl7eLKzIlFhQaWhdFkwwy0uV15JIKypLqMhzyqoyM0QJWXEQNu0s65owklkLqgaRFcbyY3Sx5fZj2UJl05bBNLoPrjVh0t44_fGnc2u98o9aJT7JsgQ4fQME_2eEIeoHP4YuzayZUDkvGFOz6nyrssEPQ4B650CJnhPUc0Z6zku_Jpg6vr8fbKf_n1cSyK1g4xqYPuPpu-XlFvwPygSqYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478392276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early‐stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Atallah, Soha ; Le, Lisa W. ; Bezjak, Andrea ; MacRae, Robert ; Hope, Andrew J. ; Pantarotto, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Atallah, Soha ; Le, Lisa W. ; Bezjak, Andrea ; MacRae, Robert ; Hope, Andrew J. ; Pantarotto, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Background
To assess correlation of pretreatment specific growth rate (SGR) value of 0.43 × 10‐2 with overall and failure‐free survival of patients with early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Methods
A retrospective chart review of 160 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between June 2010 and December 2012 in a large, tertiary cancer institute was undertaken. Both diagnostic and archived planning CT were uploaded to the treatment planning system to determine tumor volume at diagnosis (GTV1) and planning time (GTV2). The time (t) between both CTs was recorded. SGR was calculated using GTV1, GTV2, and t. The median SGR (0.43 × 10‐2) from our previous data was used to group patients into low and high SGR cohorts. Log‐rank test was used to compare overall (OS) and failure‐free survivals (FFS) of SGR groups.
Results
The median time interval between diagnostic and planning CT scans was 87 days. The median OS was 38 and 66 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.03). The median FFS was 27 and 55 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.005). High SGR (P < 0.05), male gender (P = <0.01), and GTV2 (P = <0.05) were associated with poorer FFS.
Conclusions
High SGR was associated with poorer outcome in patients with early‐stage NSCLC treated with SBRT. SGR can be used in conjunction with other well‐known predictive factors to formulate a practical predictive model to identify subgroups of the patient at higher risk of recurrence after SBRT.
We demonstrated that tumor growth rate (GR) predicts treatment outcome in early‐stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT. We used specific growth rate (SGR) as a metric for pretreatment GR and its median (0.43 × 10‐2) to group patients into high and low SGR cohorts. In this study, the same median SGR was validated in an independent dataset at a different cancer institution. Patients with high SGR tumors consistently had significantly lower survival and higher regional failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-7706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13744</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33258301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Failure ; Gender ; Growth rate ; Lung cancer ; Medical prognosis ; Original ; predictive model ; Radiation therapy ; SBRT ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Thoracic cancer, 2021-01, Vol.12 (2), p.201-209</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6802-6790 ; 0000-0001-6793-2863</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2478392276/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2478392276?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33258301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atallah, Soha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Lisa W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezjak, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacRae, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hope, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantarotto, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early‐stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy</title><title>Thoracic cancer</title><addtitle>Thorac Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
To assess correlation of pretreatment specific growth rate (SGR) value of 0.43 × 10‐2 with overall and failure‐free survival of patients with early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Methods
A retrospective chart review of 160 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between June 2010 and December 2012 in a large, tertiary cancer institute was undertaken. Both diagnostic and archived planning CT were uploaded to the treatment planning system to determine tumor volume at diagnosis (GTV1) and planning time (GTV2). The time (t) between both CTs was recorded. SGR was calculated using GTV1, GTV2, and t. The median SGR (0.43 × 10‐2) from our previous data was used to group patients into low and high SGR cohorts. Log‐rank test was used to compare overall (OS) and failure‐free survivals (FFS) of SGR groups.
Results
The median time interval between diagnostic and planning CT scans was 87 days. The median OS was 38 and 66 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.03). The median FFS was 27 and 55 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.005). High SGR (P < 0.05), male gender (P = <0.01), and GTV2 (P = <0.05) were associated with poorer FFS.
Conclusions
High SGR was associated with poorer outcome in patients with early‐stage NSCLC treated with SBRT. SGR can be used in conjunction with other well‐known predictive factors to formulate a practical predictive model to identify subgroups of the patient at higher risk of recurrence after SBRT.
We demonstrated that tumor growth rate (GR) predicts treatment outcome in early‐stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT. We used specific growth rate (SGR) as a metric for pretreatment GR and its median (0.43 × 10‐2) to group patients into high and low SGR cohorts. In this study, the same median SGR was validated in an independent dataset at a different cancer institution. Patients with high SGR tumors consistently had significantly lower survival and higher regional failure.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>predictive model</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>SBRT</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1759-7706</issn><issn>1759-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1O3DAUhS1EBYiy7q6yxHrAv3GyQUIjaCshsYFuLce5mTFK4tRxGGXHA7DgGfskdRg6ghV3Y8s-9zv36iD0jZIzmuqcKlkslKLijHIlxB462r3s7-4kO0Qnw_BAUvG8IEweoEPOmcw5oUfo-bdpXGWi61bYtb2xEfsa9wFiABNb6CKOY-sDXgW_iWscTATsO-zHaH0LsxhMaKa_Ty9DNCvAzZhI1nQWAn5lQIU3LnUOEQL4mBycxaWvpsSqXHJOtLiGYPrpK_pSm2aAk7fzGN1fX90tfy5ubn_8Wl7eLKzIlFhQaWhdFkwwy0uV15JIKypLqMhzyqoyM0QJWXEQNu0s65owklkLqgaRFcbyY3Sx5fZj2UJl05bBNLoPrjVh0t44_fGnc2u98o9aJT7JsgQ4fQME_2eEIeoHP4YuzayZUDkvGFOz6nyrssEPQ4B650CJnhPUc0Z6zku_Jpg6vr8fbKf_n1cSyK1g4xqYPuPpu-XlFvwPygSqYg</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Atallah, Soha</creator><creator>Le, Lisa W.</creator><creator>Bezjak, Andrea</creator><creator>MacRae, Robert</creator><creator>Hope, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Pantarotto, Jason</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-6790</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-2863</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early‐stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy</title><author>Atallah, Soha ; Le, Lisa W. ; Bezjak, Andrea ; MacRae, Robert ; Hope, Andrew J. ; Pantarotto, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>predictive model</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>SBRT</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atallah, Soha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Lisa W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezjak, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacRae, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hope, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantarotto, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Thoracic cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atallah, Soha</au><au>Le, Lisa W.</au><au>Bezjak, Andrea</au><au>MacRae, Robert</au><au>Hope, Andrew J.</au><au>Pantarotto, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early‐stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy</atitle><jtitle>Thoracic cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Thorac Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>201-209</pages><issn>1759-7706</issn><eissn>1759-7714</eissn><abstract>Background
To assess correlation of pretreatment specific growth rate (SGR) value of 0.43 × 10‐2 with overall and failure‐free survival of patients with early‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
Methods
A retrospective chart review of 160 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between June 2010 and December 2012 in a large, tertiary cancer institute was undertaken. Both diagnostic and archived planning CT were uploaded to the treatment planning system to determine tumor volume at diagnosis (GTV1) and planning time (GTV2). The time (t) between both CTs was recorded. SGR was calculated using GTV1, GTV2, and t. The median SGR (0.43 × 10‐2) from our previous data was used to group patients into low and high SGR cohorts. Log‐rank test was used to compare overall (OS) and failure‐free survivals (FFS) of SGR groups.
Results
The median time interval between diagnostic and planning CT scans was 87 days. The median OS was 38 and 66 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.03). The median FFS was 27 and 55 months for high and low SGR cohorts, respectively (P = 0.005). High SGR (P < 0.05), male gender (P = <0.01), and GTV2 (P = <0.05) were associated with poorer FFS.
Conclusions
High SGR was associated with poorer outcome in patients with early‐stage NSCLC treated with SBRT. SGR can be used in conjunction with other well‐known predictive factors to formulate a practical predictive model to identify subgroups of the patient at higher risk of recurrence after SBRT.
We demonstrated that tumor growth rate (GR) predicts treatment outcome in early‐stage lung cancer patients treated with SBRT. We used specific growth rate (SGR) as a metric for pretreatment GR and its median (0.43 × 10‐2) to group patients into high and low SGR cohorts. In this study, the same median SGR was validated in an independent dataset at a different cancer institution. Patients with high SGR tumors consistently had significantly lower survival and higher regional failure.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>33258301</pmid><doi>10.1111/1759-7714.13744</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-6790</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-2863</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1759-7706 |
ispartof | Thoracic cancer, 2021-01, Vol.12 (2), p.201-209 |
issn | 1759-7706 1759-7714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7812066 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed; Wiley Open Access |
subjects | Biopsy Cancer therapies Failure Gender Growth rate Lung cancer Medical prognosis Original predictive model Radiation therapy SBRT Tumors |
title | Validating impact of pretreatment tumor growth rate on outcome of early‐stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20impact%20of%20pretreatment%20tumor%20growth%20rate%20on%20outcome%20of%20early%E2%80%90stage%20lung%20cancer%20treated%20with%20stereotactic%20body%20radiation%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Thoracic%20cancer&rft.au=Atallah,%20Soha&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=201-209&rft.issn=1759-7706&rft.eissn=1759-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1759-7714.13744&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2478392276%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-15a1fb9242c3b78f505c4dc0148812db6a0745d3e4c0035ff0206cce7fe469ac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478392276&rft_id=info:pmid/33258301&rfr_iscdi=true |