Mentorship of Underrepresented Physicians and Trainees in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2021-04, Vol.36 (4), p.1023-1034
• Main Authors: Bonifacino, Eliana, Ufomata, Eloho O., Farkas, Amy H., Turner, Rose, Corbelli, Jennifer A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Documents; Internal Medicine; Medical personnel; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mentoring programs; Mentors; Minority & ethnic groups; Physicians; Program evaluation; Retention; Review Paper; Reviews; Scientific papers; Systematic review
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06478-7

Background Though the USA is becoming increasingly diverse, the physician workforce contains a disproportionately low number of physicians from racial and ethnic groups that are described as underrepresented in medicine (URiM). Mentorship has been proposed as one way to improve the retention and experiences of URiM physicians and trainees. The objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe mentoring programs for URiM physicians in academic medicine and to describe important themes from existing literature that can aid in the development of URiM mentorship programs. Methods The authors searched PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Cochrane databases, and included original publications that described a US mentorship program involving academic medical doctors at the faculty or trainee level and were created for physicians who are URiM or provided results stratified by race/ethnicity. Results Our search yielded 4,548 unique citations and 31 publications met our inclusion criteria. Frequently cited objectives of these programs were to improve research skills, to diversify representation in specific fields, and to recruit and retain URiM participants. Subjective outcomes were primarily participant satisfaction with the program and/or work climate. The dyad model of mentoring was the most common, though several novel models were also described. Program evaluations were primarily subjective and reported high satisfaction, although some reported objective outcomes including publications, retention, and promotion. All showed satisfactory outcomes for the mentorship programs. Discussion This review describes a range of successful mentoring programs for URiM physicians. Our recommendations based on our review include the importance of institutional support for diversity, tailoring programs to local needs and resources, training mentors, and utilizing URiM and non-URiM mentors.