Transradial access for flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms: Case series

• Published in: Interventional neuroradiology 2021-02, Vol.27 (1), p.68-74
• Main Authors: Waqas, Muhammad, Vakharia, Kunal, Dossani, Rimal H, Rajah, Gary B, Tso, Michael K, Gong, Andrew D, Rho, Kyungduk, Rai, Hamid H, Snyder, Kenneth V, Levy, Elad I, Siddiqui, Adnan H, Davies, Jason M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Carotid Artery, Common; Cerebral Aneurysms; Embolization, Therapeutic; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging; Intracranial Aneurysm - therapy; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1591-0199; 2385-2011
• DOI: 10.1177/1591019920938961

Background Transradial access for neurointerventions offers advantages of fewer access-site complications, reduced procedure time, and greater patient comfort over transfemoral access. Data about transradial access for flow diversion are limited. We share our early experience with transradial access for flow diversion in a relatively large case series. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent Pipeline embolization device (Medtronic) deployment via transradial access were included in the study, irrespective of location and laterality of the intracranial aneurysm. The cases were performed between July 2016 and October 2019. Demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and procedure-related details (including catheter systems used) were recorded and statistically evaluated. Results Thirty-five transradial flow diversion procedures were attempted in 32 patients, of which 33 procedures were successful. In two cases involving left common carotid artery and internal carotid artery access, guide catheter herniation into the aortic arch led to abandonment of transradial access in favor of transfemoral access. The most common aneurysm locations in the transradial access procedures were the posterior communicating artery (n = 7), ophthalmic artery (n = 7), and superior hypophyseal artery (n = 7). Most transradial access procedures (66.7%) were performed using a biaxial catheter system. 6-French Benchmark (Penumbra) and Phenom 27 (Medtronic) were the most commonly utilized guide- and microcatheters, respectively. One patient had intraprocedural subarachnoid hemorrhage. No access-site complications occurred. Conclusion This study demonstrates safety and feasibility of transradial access for Pipeline embolization device deployment and shows the versatility of this approach for different catheter systems. Tortuosity and acute angulation of the left common carotid artery and internal carotid artery were associated with approach failure.