Loading…
Gastric Cancer Risk Prediction Using an Epidemiological Risk Assessment Model and Polygenic Risk Score
We investigated the performance of a gastric cancer (GC) risk assessment model in combination with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as a polygenic risk score (PRS) in consideration of ( infection status. Six SNPs identified from genome-wide association studies and a marginal association with G...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancers 2021-02, Vol.13 (4), p.876 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We investigated the performance of a gastric cancer (GC) risk assessment model in combination with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as a polygenic risk score (PRS) in consideration of
(
infection status. Six SNPs identified from genome-wide association studies and a marginal association with GC in the study population were included in the PRS. Discrimination of the GC risk assessment model, PRS, and the combination of the two (PRS-GCS) were examined regarding incremental risk and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with grouping according to
infection status. The GC risk assessment model score showed an association with GC, irrespective of
infection. Conversely, the PRS exhibited an association only for those with
infection. The PRS did not discriminate GC in those without
infection, whereas the GC risk assessment model showed a modest discrimination. Among individuals with
infection, discrimination by the GC risk assessment model and the PRS were comparable, with the PRS-GCS combination resulting in an increase in the AUC of 3%. In addition, the PRS-GCS classified more patients and fewer controls at the highest score quintile in those with
infection. Overall, the PRS-GCS improved the identification of a GC-susceptible population of people with
infection. In those without
infection, the GC risk assessment model was better at identifying the high-risk group. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
DOI: | 10.3390/cancers13040876 |