Loading…

Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer

Background It is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population‐based data set. Methods Treatment re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery 2017-07, Vol.104 (8), p.1087-1096
Main Authors: Del Paggio, J. C., Peng, Y., Wei, X., Nanji, S., MacDonald, P. H., Krishnan Nair, C., Booth, C. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4090-a191b24881ccb33f2132af14c11114bc0ba7d39390c272b3bbf77ee354500e193
cites
container_end_page 1096
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1087
container_title British journal of surgery
container_volume 104
creator Del Paggio, J. C.
Peng, Y.
Wei, X.
Nanji, S.
MacDonald, P. H.
Krishnan Nair, C.
Booth, C. M.
description Background It is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population‐based data set. Methods Treatment records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify a 25 per cent random sample of all patients with stage II/III colonic cancer between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable regression and Cox models evaluated factors associated with LN positivity and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) respectively. Optimal thresholds were obtained using sequential regression analysis. Results On adjusted analysis of 5508 eligible patients, younger age (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bjs.10540
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7938819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1903158899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4090-a191b24881ccb33f2132af14c11114bc0ba7d39390c272b3bbf77ee354500e193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9OFTEUxhsjkSu68AVMEzdsRk7bGabdkAhBxZBgIq6btnOu9Ka3HaYzkNnxCDyjT2Iv_4KczTnp-eXr136EfGDwmQHwPbvKZWhqeEUWTOw3FWf78jVZAEBbMcHFNnmb8wqACWj4G7LNZVNz1dQLcv4z9VMwo0_x782tNRk7msepm-mY6IDlDK9MmMyINPWjX5tAw7zuL2hMHdLZY-ioj9SlkKJ31JnocHhHtpYmZHz_0HfI76_H50ffq9OzbydHX04rV4OCyjDFLK-lZM5ZIZa8WDVLVjtWqrYOrGk7oYQCx1tuhbXLtkUUTd0AIFNihxzc6_aTXWPnMI6DCbofis9h1sl4_f8m-gv9J13pVoly60Zg90FgSJcT5lGvfXYYgomYpqyZAsEaKdUG_fQCXaVpiOV5G0q2kkshC_XxuaMnK48fXoC9e-DaB5yf9gz0JkldktR3SerDH7_uBvEPdjmSSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908782838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Del Paggio, J. C. ; Peng, Y. ; Wei, X. ; Nanji, S. ; MacDonald, P. H. ; Krishnan Nair, C. ; Booth, C. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Del Paggio, J. C. ; Peng, Y. ; Wei, X. ; Nanji, S. ; MacDonald, P. H. ; Krishnan Nair, C. ; Booth, C. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background It is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population‐based data set. Methods Treatment records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify a 25 per cent random sample of all patients with stage II/III colonic cancer between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable regression and Cox models evaluated factors associated with LN positivity and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) respectively. Optimal thresholds were obtained using sequential regression analysis. Results On adjusted analysis of 5508 eligible patients, younger age (P &lt; 0·001), left‐sided tumours (P = 0·003), higher T category (P &lt; 0·001) and greater LN yield (relative risk 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·81 to 0·97; P = 0·007) were associated with a greater likelihood of LN positivity. Regression analyses with multiple thresholds suggested no substantial increase in LN positivity beyond 12–14 LNs. Cox analysis of stage II disease showed that lower LN yield was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·55–1·74; P &lt; 0·001) compared with a greater LN yield, with no significant survival benefit beyond a yield of 20 LNs. Similarly, for stage III disease, a lower LN yield was associated with an increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·49–2·20; P &lt; 0·001) versus a large LN yield. In stage III disease, there was no observed LN threshold for survival benefit in the data set. Conclusion There is incongruity in the optimal LN evaluation for colonic cancer. Although the historically stated threshold of 12 LNs may ensure accurate staging in colonic cancer, thresholds for optimal survival are associated with far greater yields. Twelve is not the magic number</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10540</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28542954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Colonic Neoplasms - mortality ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal cancer ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Female ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - mortality ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ontario - epidemiology ; Original ; Population-based studies ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2017-07, Vol.104 (8), p.1087-1096</ispartof><rights>2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4090-a191b24881ccb33f2132af14c11114bc0ba7d39390c272b3bbf77ee354500e193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28542954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Del Paggio, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanji, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan Nair, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booth, C. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Background It is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population‐based data set. Methods Treatment records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify a 25 per cent random sample of all patients with stage II/III colonic cancer between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable regression and Cox models evaluated factors associated with LN positivity and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) respectively. Optimal thresholds were obtained using sequential regression analysis. Results On adjusted analysis of 5508 eligible patients, younger age (P &lt; 0·001), left‐sided tumours (P = 0·003), higher T category (P &lt; 0·001) and greater LN yield (relative risk 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·81 to 0·97; P = 0·007) were associated with a greater likelihood of LN positivity. Regression analyses with multiple thresholds suggested no substantial increase in LN positivity beyond 12–14 LNs. Cox analysis of stage II disease showed that lower LN yield was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·55–1·74; P &lt; 0·001) compared with a greater LN yield, with no significant survival benefit beyond a yield of 20 LNs. Similarly, for stage III disease, a lower LN yield was associated with an increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·49–2·20; P &lt; 0·001) versus a large LN yield. In stage III disease, there was no observed LN threshold for survival benefit in the data set. Conclusion There is incongruity in the optimal LN evaluation for colonic cancer. Although the historically stated threshold of 12 LNs may ensure accurate staging in colonic cancer, thresholds for optimal survival are associated with far greater yields. Twelve is not the magic number</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - mortality</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ontario - epidemiology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc9OFTEUxhsjkSu68AVMEzdsRk7bGabdkAhBxZBgIq6btnOu9Ka3HaYzkNnxCDyjT2Iv_4KczTnp-eXr136EfGDwmQHwPbvKZWhqeEUWTOw3FWf78jVZAEBbMcHFNnmb8wqACWj4G7LNZVNz1dQLcv4z9VMwo0_x782tNRk7msepm-mY6IDlDK9MmMyINPWjX5tAw7zuL2hMHdLZY-ioj9SlkKJ31JnocHhHtpYmZHz_0HfI76_H50ffq9OzbydHX04rV4OCyjDFLK-lZM5ZIZa8WDVLVjtWqrYOrGk7oYQCx1tuhbXLtkUUTd0AIFNihxzc6_aTXWPnMI6DCbofis9h1sl4_f8m-gv9J13pVoly60Zg90FgSJcT5lGvfXYYgomYpqyZAsEaKdUG_fQCXaVpiOV5G0q2kkshC_XxuaMnK48fXoC9e-DaB5yf9gz0JkldktR3SerDH7_uBvEPdjmSSA</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Del Paggio, J. C.</creator><creator>Peng, Y.</creator><creator>Wei, X.</creator><creator>Nanji, S.</creator><creator>MacDonald, P. H.</creator><creator>Krishnan Nair, C.</creator><creator>Booth, C. M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer</title><author>Del Paggio, J. C. ; Peng, Y. ; Wei, X. ; Nanji, S. ; MacDonald, P. H. ; Krishnan Nair, C. ; Booth, C. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4090-a191b24881ccb33f2132af14c11114bc0ba7d39390c272b3bbf77ee354500e193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - mortality</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ontario - epidemiology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Del Paggio, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanji, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan Nair, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booth, C. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Del Paggio, J. C.</au><au>Peng, Y.</au><au>Wei, X.</au><au>Nanji, S.</au><au>MacDonald, P. H.</au><au>Krishnan Nair, C.</au><au>Booth, C. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1096</epage><pages>1087-1096</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><abstract>Background It is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population‐based data set. Methods Treatment records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify a 25 per cent random sample of all patients with stage II/III colonic cancer between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable regression and Cox models evaluated factors associated with LN positivity and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) respectively. Optimal thresholds were obtained using sequential regression analysis. Results On adjusted analysis of 5508 eligible patients, younger age (P &lt; 0·001), left‐sided tumours (P = 0·003), higher T category (P &lt; 0·001) and greater LN yield (relative risk 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·81 to 0·97; P = 0·007) were associated with a greater likelihood of LN positivity. Regression analyses with multiple thresholds suggested no substantial increase in LN positivity beyond 12–14 LNs. Cox analysis of stage II disease showed that lower LN yield was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·55–1·74; P &lt; 0·001) compared with a greater LN yield, with no significant survival benefit beyond a yield of 20 LNs. Similarly, for stage III disease, a lower LN yield was associated with an increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·49–2·20; P &lt; 0·001) versus a large LN yield. In stage III disease, there was no observed LN threshold for survival benefit in the data set. Conclusion There is incongruity in the optimal LN evaluation for colonic cancer. Although the historically stated threshold of 12 LNs may ensure accurate staging in colonic cancer, thresholds for optimal survival are associated with far greater yields. Twelve is not the magic number</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>28542954</pmid><doi>10.1002/bjs.10540</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1323
ispartof British journal of surgery, 2017-07, Vol.104 (8), p.1087-1096
issn 0007-1323
1365-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7938819
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer
Colonic Neoplasms - mortality
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
Colorectal cancer
Epidemiologic Methods
Female
Health risk assessment
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - mortality
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphatic system
Male
Middle Aged
Ontario - epidemiology
Original
Population-based studies
Socioeconomic Factors
Young Adult
title Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%E2%80%90based%20study%20to%20re%E2%80%90evaluate%20optimal%20lymph%20node%20yield%20in%20colonic%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Del%20Paggio,%20J.%20C.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1096&rft.pages=1087-1096&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bjs.10540&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1903158899%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4090-a191b24881ccb33f2132af14c11114bc0ba7d39390c272b3bbf77ee354500e193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908782838&rft_id=info:pmid/28542954&rfr_iscdi=true