Loading…

Comparative incidence and outcomes of COVID‐19 in kidney or kidney‐pancreas transplant recipients versus kidney or kidney‐pancreas waitlisted patients: A single‐center study

Background COVID‐19 epidemiologic studies comparing immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients may provide insight into the impact of immunosuppressants on outcomes. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we assembled kidney or kidney‐pancreas transplant recipients who underwent transplant f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical Transplantation 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.e14362-n/a
Main Authors: Santos, Carlos A. Q., Rhee, Yoona, Hollinger, Edward F., Olaitan, Oyedolamu K., Schadde, Erik, Peev, Vasil, Saltzberg, Samuel N., Hertl, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background COVID‐19 epidemiologic studies comparing immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients may provide insight into the impact of immunosuppressants on outcomes. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we assembled kidney or kidney‐pancreas transplant recipients who underwent transplant from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2020, and kidney or kidney‐pancreas waitlisted patients who were ever on the waitlist from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020. We identified laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 until January 31, 2021, and tracked its outcomes by leveraging informatics infrastructure developed for an outcomes research network. Results COVID‐19 was identified in 62 of 887 kidney or kidney‐pancreas transplant recipients and 20 of 434 kidney or kidney‐pancreas waitlisted patients (7.0% vs. 4.6%, p = .092). Of these patients with COVID‐19, hospitalization occurred in 48 of 62 transplant recipients and 8 of 20 waitlisted patients (77% vs. 40%, p = .002); intensive care unit admission occurred in 18 of 62 transplant recipients and 2 of 20 waitlisted patients (29% vs. 10%, p = .085); and 7 transplant recipients were mechanically ventilated and died, whereas no waitlisted patients were mechanically ventilated or died (11% vs. 0%, p = .116). Conclusions Our study provides single‐center data and an informatics approach that can be used to inform the design of multicenter studies.
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/ctr.14362