Loading…
Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein thrombosis: The United States Safety Net and Academic Center Collaborative Analysis
Background Although consensus guidelines generally discourage any surgical management (ASM; i.e., resection and/or transplantation) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT), recent series from Asia have challenged this paradigm. Methods Patients from the US Sa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2021-02, Vol.123 (2), p.407-415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Although consensus guidelines generally discourage any surgical management (ASM; i.e., resection and/or transplantation) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT), recent series from Asia have challenged this paradigm.
Methods
Patients from the US Safety Net Collaborative database (2012–2014) with localized HCC and radiographically confirmed PVT were propensity‐score matched based on demographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with receipt of ASM and overall survival (OS). OS was compared between patients undergoing ASM and those not selected for surgery.
Results
Of 1910 HCC patients, 207 (14.5%) had localized disease and PVT. The majority received either liver‐directed therapies (LDTs; 34%) and/or targeted systemic therapies (36%). Twenty‐one patients (10.1%) underwent ASM (resection [n = 11], transplantation [n = 10]); a third experienced any complication with no 30‐day mortalities. Independent predictors of undergoing ASM were younger age, recent hepatology consultation, and lower model of end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score. After matching for age, comorbidities, MELD, tumor size, receipt of LDT, or systemic therapy, OS was significantly longer for patients selected for ASM versus non‐ASM patients (median not reached vs. 5.8 months, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.26282 |