Loading…

Revisiting the pathogenic mechanism of the GJB1 5’ UTR c.-103C > T mutation causing CMTX1

The second most common form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (CMT), X-linked CMT type X1 (CMTX1), is caused by coding and non-coding mutations in the gap junction beta 1 ( GJB1 ) gene. The non-coding GJB1 c.-103C > T mutation (NM_000166.5) has been reported to cause CMTX1 in multiple families. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurogenetics 2021-07, Vol.22 (3), p.149-160
Main Authors: Grosz, Bianca R., Svaren, John, Perez-Siles, Gonzalo, Nicholson, Garth A., Kennerson, Marina L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The second most common form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (CMT), X-linked CMT type X1 (CMTX1), is caused by coding and non-coding mutations in the gap junction beta 1 ( GJB1 ) gene. The non-coding GJB1 c.-103C > T mutation (NM_000166.5) has been reported to cause CMTX1 in multiple families. This study assessed the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) activity previously reported for the rat Gjb1 P2 5’ untranslated region (UTR). Using a bicistronic assay and transfecting RT4 Schwann cells, IRES activity of the human GJB1 P2 5’ UTR was compared to the GJB1 P2 5’ UTR containing either the c.-103C > T mutation or the non-pathogenic c.-102G > A variant. No differences in GJB1 P2 5’ UTR IRES activity were observed between the negative control, the wild-type P2 5’ UTR, the c.-103C > T 5’ UTR or the c.-102G > A 5’ UTR, irrespective of the GJB1 intron being present ( p  = .429 with intron, and p  = .865 without). A theoretical c.-131A > G variant was predicted to result in the same RNA secondary structure as the GJB1 c.-103C > T P2 5’ UTR. However, no significant difference was observed between expression from the wild-type GJB1 P2 5’ UTR and the GJB1 c.-131A > G variant ( p  = .688). Deletion of the conserved region surrounding the c.-103C > T mutation (c.-108_-103del) resulted in significantly higher expression than the c.-103C > T mutation alone ( p  = .019), suggesting that the conserved c.-108_-103 region was not essential for translation. The reporter assays in this study do not recapitulate the previously reported GJB1 IRES activity and suggest an alternate pathogenic mechanism for the c.-103C > T CMTX1 non-coding mutation.
ISSN:1364-6745
1364-6753
1364-6753
DOI:10.1007/s10048-021-00650-9