Loading…
Revisiting the pathogenic mechanism of the GJB1 5’ UTR c.-103C > T mutation causing CMTX1
The second most common form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (CMT), X-linked CMT type X1 (CMTX1), is caused by coding and non-coding mutations in the gap junction beta 1 ( GJB1 ) gene. The non-coding GJB1 c.-103C > T mutation (NM_000166.5) has been reported to cause CMTX1 in multiple families. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurogenetics 2021-07, Vol.22 (3), p.149-160 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The second most common form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (CMT), X-linked CMT type X1 (CMTX1), is caused by coding and non-coding mutations in the gap junction beta 1 (
GJB1
) gene. The non-coding
GJB1
c.-103C > T mutation (NM_000166.5) has been reported to cause CMTX1 in multiple families. This study assessed the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) activity previously reported for the rat
Gjb1
P2 5’ untranslated region (UTR). Using a bicistronic assay and transfecting RT4 Schwann cells, IRES activity of the human
GJB1
P2 5’ UTR was compared to the
GJB1
P2 5’ UTR containing either the c.-103C > T mutation or the non-pathogenic c.-102G > A variant. No differences in
GJB1
P2 5’ UTR IRES activity were observed between the negative control, the wild-type P2 5’ UTR, the c.-103C > T 5’ UTR or the c.-102G > A 5’ UTR, irrespective of the
GJB1
intron being present (
p
= .429 with intron, and
p
= .865 without). A theoretical c.-131A > G variant was predicted to result in the same RNA secondary structure as the
GJB1
c.-103C > T P2 5’ UTR. However, no significant difference was observed between expression from the wild-type
GJB1
P2 5’ UTR and the
GJB1
c.-131A > G variant (
p
= .688). Deletion of the conserved region surrounding the c.-103C > T mutation (c.-108_-103del) resulted in significantly higher expression than the c.-103C > T mutation alone (
p
= .019), suggesting that the conserved c.-108_-103 region was not essential for translation. The reporter assays in this study do not recapitulate the previously reported
GJB1
IRES activity and suggest an alternate pathogenic mechanism for the c.-103C > T CMTX1 non-coding mutation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1364-6745 1364-6753 1364-6753 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10048-021-00650-9 |