Loading…
Primary immunodeficiency testing in a Massachusetts tertiary care NICU: persistent challenges in the extremely premature population
Background Prematurity presents a diagnostic challenge in interpreting primary immunodeficiency (PID) testing. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all infants in our level IV referral neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Massachusetts, with immunologic testing performed from 2006 to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatric research 2021-02, Vol.89 (3), p.549-553 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Prematurity presents a diagnostic challenge in interpreting primary immunodeficiency (PID) testing.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all infants in our level IV referral neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Massachusetts, with immunologic testing performed from 2006 to 2018.
Results
The overall rate of PID testing was enriched in our population, with 1% of admitted patients having extended immunologic testing. The addition of TREC (T cell receptor excision circle) newborn screening in Massachusetts in 2009 increased the proportion of infants tested for PID in our NICU by 3-fold (1.21% post-newborn screening (NBS) vs. 0.46% pre-NBS). A majority of the term and late preterm (≥34 weeks) infants (31 of 41, 76%), as well as very premature (29–33 weeks) infants (12 of 17, 71%), who had immune testing, had a genetic diagnosis associated with secondary immunodeficiency or a PID. Most infants who were born extremely premature (EP, |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-3998 1530-0447 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41390-020-0886-6 |