Kinetic and Structural Characterization of the Self-Labeling Protein Tags HaloTag7, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag

• Published in: Biochemistry (Easton) 2021-08, Vol.60 (33), p.2560-2575
• Main Authors: Wilhelm, Jonas, Kühn, Stefanie, Tarnawski, Miroslaw, Gotthard, Guillaume, Tünnermann, Jana, Tänzer, Timo, Karpenko, Julie, Mertes, Nicole, Xue, Lin, Uhrig, Ulrike, Reinstein, Jochen, Hiblot, Julien, Johnsson, Kai
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Fluorescent Dyes - chemistry; Kinetics; Life Sciences; Models, Molecular; O-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase - chemistry; O-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase - genetics; Protein Structure, Tertiary; Recombinant Fusion Proteins - chemistry; Recombinant Fusion Proteins - genetics; Rhodamines - chemistry; Staining and Labeling; Substrate Specificity
• ISSN: 0006-2960; 1520-4995
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00258

The self-labeling protein tags (SLPs) HaloTag7, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag allow the covalent labeling of fusion proteins with synthetic molecules for applications in bioimaging and biotechnology. To guide the selection of an SLP–substrate pair and provide guidelines for the design of substrates, we report a systematic and comparative study of the labeling kinetics and substrate specificities of HaloTag7, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag. HaloTag7 reaches almost diffusion-limited labeling rate constants with certain rhodamine substrates, which are more than 2 orders of magnitude higher than those of SNAP-tag for the corresponding substrates. SNAP-tag labeling rate constants, however, are less affected by the structure of the label than those of HaloTag7, which vary over 6 orders of magnitude for commonly employed substrates. Determining the crystal structures of HaloTag7 and SNAP-tag labeled with fluorescent substrates allowed us to rationalize their substrate preferences. We also demonstrate how these insights can be exploited to design substrates with improved labeling kinetics.