Loading…

Non-invasive monitoring of suprachoroidal, subretinal, and intravitreal implants using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (cSLO) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)

To address the need for noninvasive monitoring of injectable preformed drug delivery implants in the eye, we developed noninvasive methods to monitor such implants from different locations within the eye. Cylindrical polymeric poly(lactide-co-glycolide) or metal implants were injected into isolated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pharmaceutics 2021-07, Vol.606, p.120887-120887
Main Authors: Patil, Madhoosudan A., Kompella, Uday B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To address the need for noninvasive monitoring of injectable preformed drug delivery implants in the eye, we developed noninvasive methods to monitor such implants from different locations within the eye. Cylindrical polymeric poly(lactide-co-glycolide) or metal implants were injected into isolated bovine eyes at suprachoroidal, subretinal, and intravitreal locations and imaged noninvasively using the cSLO and OCT modes of a Heidelberg Spectralis HRA+OCT instrument after adjusting for the corneal curvature. Length and diameter of implants were obtained using cSLO images for all three locations, and the volume was calculated. Additionally, implant volume for suprachoroidal and subretinal location was estimated by integrating the cross-sectional bleb area over the implant length in multiple OCT images or using the maximum thickness of the implant based on thickness map along with length in cSLO image. Simultaneous cSLO and OCT imaging identified implants in different regions of the eye. Image-based measurements of implant dimensions mostly correlated well with the values prior to injection using blade micrometer. The accuracy (82–112%) and precision (1–19%) for noninvasive measurement of length was better than the diameter (accuracy 69–130%; precision 3–38%) using cSLO image for both types of implants. The accuracy for the measurement of volume of both types of implants from all three intraocular locations was better with cSLO imaging (42–152%) compared to those obtained using OCT cross-sectional bleb area integration (117–556%) or cSLO and thickness map (32–279%) methods. Suprachoroidal, subretinal, and intravitreal implants can be monitored for length, diameter, and volume using cSLO and OCT imaging. Such measurements may be useful in noninvasively monitoring implant degradation and drug release in the eye.
ISSN:0378-5173
1873-3476
DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120887