Loading…

Altered swallowing biomechanics in people with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea

Dysphagia is a common but under-recognized complication of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the mechanisms remain poorly described. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess swallowing symptoms and use high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) to quantify swallowing biomechanics in p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical sleep medicine 2021-09, Vol.17 (9), p.1793-1803
Main Authors: Schar, Mistyka S, Omari, Taher I, Woods, Charmaine M, Ferris, Lara F, Doeltgen, Sebastian H, Lushington, Kurt, Kontos, Anna, Athanasiadis, Theodore, Cock, Charles, Chai Coetzer, Ching-Li, Eckert, Danny J, Ooi, Eng H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dysphagia is a common but under-recognized complication of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the mechanisms remain poorly described. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess swallowing symptoms and use high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) to quantify swallowing biomechanics in patients with moderate-severe OSA. Nineteen adults (4 female, mean age 46±26-68y) with moderate-severe OSA underwent HRPM testing with 5,10 & 20 ml volumes of thin and extremely thick liquids. Data were compared to 19 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age 46±27-68y). Symptomatic dysphagia was assessed using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ). Swallow metrics were analyzed using the online application swallowgateway.com. General linear mixed model analysis was performed to investigate potential differences between people with moderate-severe OSA and controls. Data presented are means (95% CI). 26% (5/19) of the OSA group but none of the controls reported symptomatic dysphagia (SSQ>234). Compared to healthy controls, the OSA group had increased upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation pressure (-2 [-1] vs. 2 [1]mmHg, F = 32.1, p
ISSN:1550-9389
1550-9397
DOI:10.5664/jcsm.9286