COVID-19 response: effectiveness of weekly rapid risk assessments, Italy

• Published in: Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2022-02, Vol.100 (2), p.161-167
• Main Authors: Riccardo, Flavia, Guzzetta, Giorgio, Urdiales, Alberto Mateo, Del Manso, Martina, Andrianou, Xanthi D, Bella, Antonino, Pezzotti, Patrizio, Carbone, Simona, De Vito, Tiziana, Maraglino, Francesco, Demicheli, Vittorio, Dario, Claudio, Coscioni, Enrico, Rezza, Giovanni, Urbani, Andrea, Merler, Stefano, Brusaferro, Silvio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: COVID-19; Epidemics; Humans; Italy - epidemiology; Lessons from the Field; Risk Assessment; SARS-CoV-2
• ISSN: 0042-9686; 1564-0604; 1564-0604; 0042-9686
• DOI: 10.2471/BLT.21.286317

After Italy's first national restriction measures in 2020, a robust approach was needed to monitor the emerging epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at subnational level and provide data to inform the strengthening or easing of epidemic control measures. We adapted the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control rapid risk assessment tool by including quantitative and qualitative indicators from existing national surveillance systems. We defined COVID-19 risk as a combination of the probability of uncontrolled transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and of an unsustainable impact of COVID-19 cases on hospital services, adjusted in relation to the health system's resilience. The monitoring system was implemented with no additional cost in May 2020. The infectious diseases surveillance system in Italy uses consistent data collection methods across the country's decentralized regions and autonomous provinces. Weekly risk assessments using this approach were sustainable in monitoring the epidemic at regional level from 4 May 2020 to 24 September 2021. The tool provided reliable assessments of when and where a rapid increase in demand for health-care services would occur if control or mitigation measures were not increased in the following 3 weeks. Although the system worked well, framing the risk assessment tool in a legal decree hampered its flexibility, as indicators could not be changed without changing the law. The relative complexity of the tool, the impossibility of real-time validation and its use for the definition of restrictions posed communication challenges.