Loading…

Relationship Between Serum Levels of Arsenic, Cadmium, and Mercury and Body Mass Index and Fasting Plasma Glucose in a Mexican Adult Population

In Mexico, few studies have analyzed the associations between toxic elements and metabolic diseases. In the present study, we analyzed the associations between serum arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg) levels and body mass index (BMI) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in a Mexican adult popu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological trace element research 2022-12, Vol.200 (12), p.4916-4923
Main Authors: Hernández-Mendoza, Héctor, Álvarez-Loredo, Héctor Edmundo, Romero-Guzmán, Elizabeth Teresita, Gaytán-Hernández, Darío, Chang-Rueda, Consuelo, Martínez-Navarro, Israel, Juárez-Flores, Bertha Irene, Rios-Lugo, María Judith
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In Mexico, few studies have analyzed the associations between toxic elements and metabolic diseases. In the present study, we analyzed the associations between serum arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), and mercury (Hg) levels and body mass index (BMI) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in a Mexican adult population. Anthropometric data corresponding to 86 Mexican healthy adults (59 females and 27 men) were analyzed. FPG was analyzed by an enzymatic colorimetric method, and serum As, Cd, and Hg levels were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS). The data show that the median serum As, Cd, and Hg levels were relatively higher in females (As = 1.78 ng mL −1 , Cd = 1.00 ng mL −1 , Hg = 0.96 ng mL −1 ) than those in males (As = 1.22 ng mL −1 , Cd = 0.91 ng mL −1 , Hg = 0.95 ng mL −1 ). However, these differences were not statistically significant ( p  ≥ 0.097). We also found that the median level of As significantly increased with an increase in the body weight categories (normal weight = 1.08; overweight = 1.50; obesity = 2.75; p  
ISSN:0163-4984
1559-0720
DOI:10.1007/s12011-021-03081-7