Loading…

In Vivo Proton Exchange Rate (kex) MRI for the Characterization of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in Patients

Background Currently available radiological methods do not completely capture the diversity of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion subtypes. This lack of information hampers the understanding of disease progression and potential treatment stratification. For example, inflammation persists in some lesions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2021-02, Vol.53 (2), p.408-415
Main Authors: Ye, Haiqi, Shaghaghi, Mehran, Chen, Qianlan, Zhang, Yan, Lutz, Sarah E., Chen, Weiwei, Cai, Kejia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Currently available radiological methods do not completely capture the diversity of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion subtypes. This lack of information hampers the understanding of disease progression and potential treatment stratification. For example, inflammation persists in some lesions after gadolinium (Gd) enhancement resolves. Novel metabolic and molecular imaging methods may improve the current assessments of MS pathophysiology. Purpose To compare the in vivo proton exchange rate (kex) MRI with Gd‐enhanced MRI for characterizing MS lesions. Study Type Retrospective. Subjects Sixteen consecutively diagnosed relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T MRI with T2‐weighted imaging, postcontrast T1‐weighted imaging, and single‐slice chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging. Assessment MS lesions in white matter were assessed for Gd enhancement and kex elevation compared to normal‐appearing white matter (NAWM). Statistical Tests Student's t‐test was used for analyzing the difference of kex values between lesions and NAWM, with statistical significance set at 0.05. Results Of all 153 MS lesions, 78 (51%) lesions were Gd‐enhancing and 75 (49%) were Gd‐negative. Without exception, all 78 Gd‐enhancing lesions showed significantly elevated kex values compared to NAWM (924 ± 130 s–1 vs. 735 ± 61 s–1, P 
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.27363