Loading…

Linezolid therapy of Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis

The in vivo activity of linezolid or cefazolin against a clinical isolate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (linezolid MIC, 2 microg/ml) was studied in a rat model of experimental osteomyelitis. Sixty rats with experimental S. aureus osteomyelitis were treated for 21 days with no anti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2000-12, Vol.44 (12), p.3438-3440
Main Authors: PATEL, Robin, PIPER, Kerryl E, ROUSE, Mark S, STECKELBERG, James M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393
container_end_page 3440
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3438
container_title Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
container_volume 44
creator PATEL, Robin
PIPER, Kerryl E
ROUSE, Mark S
STECKELBERG, James M
description The in vivo activity of linezolid or cefazolin against a clinical isolate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (linezolid MIC, 2 microg/ml) was studied in a rat model of experimental osteomyelitis. Sixty rats with experimental S. aureus osteomyelitis were treated for 21 days with no antimicrobial, with 25 microg of linezolid per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally twice or three times a day, or with 50 microg of cefazolin per kg administered intramuscularly three times a day. After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and the infected tibiae were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The results of treatment were expressed as log(10) CFU/gram of bone and analyzed by rank sum analysis. The results of linezolid treatment were not significantly different from those of untreated controls, while cefazolin treatment was significantly more active than no treatment or linezolid treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3438-3440.2000
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_90219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72421603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3DAURkVoaSZJX6EYCt3Z0Z9lGboZhjQJDGSRZi2uZSmjorFcyS6ZPH1lMqTNKqsr0Pkun3QQKgiuCKHycr3eVJxXhFaMM1kyznFFMcYnaEVwK0tRt-IDWmEsRMkl5qfoLKVfGcgX-BM6JQRLJmq-QldbN5jn4F1fTDsTYTwUwRb3E4y7gw86aD2nAuZo8jBPo4lub4YJfBHSZML-YLybXLpAHy34ZD4f5zl6-HH1c3NTbu-ubzfrbal5w6aSd72lWlvRMNZ1wGvLsLTS9DXhYOuaUNq1TSsoZULQDmowfT4a0hFoCGvZOfr-snecu73pda4Swasxt4J4UAGcenszuJ16DH9UiylZ4t-O8Rh-zyZNau-SNt7DYMKcVEM5JQKzd0HS5O_jcgHlC6hjSCka-9qFYLWoUlmV4lwRqhZValGlFlU5-uX_t_wLHt1k4OsRgKTB2wiDdumVk3lJbvAXm_aebw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17836483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linezolid therapy of Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ASM_美国微生物学会期刊</source><creator>PATEL, Robin ; PIPER, Kerryl E ; ROUSE, Mark S ; STECKELBERG, James M</creator><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Robin ; PIPER, Kerryl E ; ROUSE, Mark S ; STECKELBERG, James M</creatorcontrib><description>The in vivo activity of linezolid or cefazolin against a clinical isolate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (linezolid MIC, 2 microg/ml) was studied in a rat model of experimental osteomyelitis. Sixty rats with experimental S. aureus osteomyelitis were treated for 21 days with no antimicrobial, with 25 microg of linezolid per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally twice or three times a day, or with 50 microg of cefazolin per kg administered intramuscularly three times a day. After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and the infected tibiae were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The results of treatment were expressed as log(10) CFU/gram of bone and analyzed by rank sum analysis. The results of linezolid treatment were not significantly different from those of untreated controls, while cefazolin treatment was significantly more active than no treatment or linezolid treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.12.3438-3440.2000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11083654</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACHAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Acetamides - blood ; Acetamides - therapeutic use ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - blood ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; cefazolin ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Disease Models, Animal ; Experimental Therapeutics ; Humans ; Linezolid ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Osteomyelitis - blood ; Osteomyelitis - drug therapy ; Oxazolidinones - blood ; Oxazolidinones - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Staphylococcal Infections - blood ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000-12, Vol.44 (12), p.3438-3440</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC90219/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC90219/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=800083$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11083654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIPER, Kerryl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUSE, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STECKELBERG, James M</creatorcontrib><title>Linezolid therapy of Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis</title><title>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</title><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><description>The in vivo activity of linezolid or cefazolin against a clinical isolate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (linezolid MIC, 2 microg/ml) was studied in a rat model of experimental osteomyelitis. Sixty rats with experimental S. aureus osteomyelitis were treated for 21 days with no antimicrobial, with 25 microg of linezolid per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally twice or three times a day, or with 50 microg of cefazolin per kg administered intramuscularly three times a day. After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and the infected tibiae were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The results of treatment were expressed as log(10) CFU/gram of bone and analyzed by rank sum analysis. The results of linezolid treatment were not significantly different from those of untreated controls, while cefazolin treatment was significantly more active than no treatment or linezolid treatment.</description><subject>Acetamides - blood</subject><subject>Acetamides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - blood</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cefazolin</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Experimental Therapeutics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linezolid</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - blood</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Oxazolidinones - blood</subject><subject>Oxazolidinones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - blood</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><issn>0066-4804</issn><issn>1098-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1q3DAURkVoaSZJX6EYCt3Z0Z9lGboZhjQJDGSRZi2uZSmjorFcyS6ZPH1lMqTNKqsr0Pkun3QQKgiuCKHycr3eVJxXhFaMM1kyznFFMcYnaEVwK0tRt-IDWmEsRMkl5qfoLKVfGcgX-BM6JQRLJmq-QldbN5jn4F1fTDsTYTwUwRb3E4y7gw86aD2nAuZo8jBPo4lub4YJfBHSZML-YLybXLpAHy34ZD4f5zl6-HH1c3NTbu-ubzfrbal5w6aSd72lWlvRMNZ1wGvLsLTS9DXhYOuaUNq1TSsoZULQDmowfT4a0hFoCGvZOfr-snecu73pda4Swasxt4J4UAGcenszuJ16DH9UiylZ4t-O8Rh-zyZNau-SNt7DYMKcVEM5JQKzd0HS5O_jcgHlC6hjSCka-9qFYLWoUlmV4lwRqhZValGlFlU5-uX_t_wLHt1k4OsRgKTB2wiDdumVk3lJbvAXm_aebw</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>PATEL, Robin</creator><creator>PIPER, Kerryl E</creator><creator>ROUSE, Mark S</creator><creator>STECKELBERG, James M</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Linezolid therapy of Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis</title><author>PATEL, Robin ; PIPER, Kerryl E ; ROUSE, Mark S ; STECKELBERG, James M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Acetamides - blood</topic><topic>Acetamides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - blood</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cefazolin</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Experimental Therapeutics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linezolid</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - blood</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Oxazolidinones - blood</topic><topic>Oxazolidinones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - blood</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIPER, Kerryl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROUSE, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STECKELBERG, James M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PATEL, Robin</au><au>PIPER, Kerryl E</au><au>ROUSE, Mark S</au><au>STECKELBERG, James M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linezolid therapy of Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis</atitle><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3438</spage><epage>3440</epage><pages>3438-3440</pages><issn>0066-4804</issn><eissn>1098-6596</eissn><coden>AACHAX</coden><abstract>The in vivo activity of linezolid or cefazolin against a clinical isolate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (linezolid MIC, 2 microg/ml) was studied in a rat model of experimental osteomyelitis. Sixty rats with experimental S. aureus osteomyelitis were treated for 21 days with no antimicrobial, with 25 microg of linezolid per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally twice or three times a day, or with 50 microg of cefazolin per kg administered intramuscularly three times a day. After treatment, the animals were sacrificed and the infected tibiae were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The results of treatment were expressed as log(10) CFU/gram of bone and analyzed by rank sum analysis. The results of linezolid treatment were not significantly different from those of untreated controls, while cefazolin treatment was significantly more active than no treatment or linezolid treatment.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>11083654</pmid><doi>10.1128/AAC.44.12.3438-3440.2000</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-4804
ispartof Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000-12, Vol.44 (12), p.3438-3440
issn 0066-4804
1098-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_90219
source Open Access: PubMed Central; ASM_美国微生物学会期刊
subjects Acetamides - blood
Acetamides - therapeutic use
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - blood
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibacterial agents
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Biological and medical sciences
cefazolin
Colony Count, Microbial
Disease Models, Animal
Experimental Therapeutics
Humans
Linezolid
Male
Medical sciences
Osteomyelitis - blood
Osteomyelitis - drug therapy
Oxazolidinones - blood
Oxazolidinones - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Staphylococcal Infections - blood
Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
title Linezolid therapy of Staphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A07%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linezolid%20therapy%20of%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20experimental%20osteomyelitis&rft.jtitle=Antimicrobial%20agents%20and%20chemotherapy&rft.au=PATEL,%20Robin&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3438&rft.epage=3440&rft.pages=3438-3440&rft.issn=0066-4804&rft.eissn=1098-6596&rft.coden=AACHAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/AAC.44.12.3438-3440.2000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72421603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4bdf2ccf6733bba45f308f8ed514af55122b9796223662ba5aed236e1b1a71393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17836483&rft_id=info:pmid/11083654&rfr_iscdi=true