Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain

• Published in: Pain and therapy 2022-06, Vol.11 (2), p.493-510
• Main Authors: Esteve, Rosa, Reyes-Pérez, Ángela, Ramírez-Maestre, Carmen, Gutiérrez-Extremera, Andrea, Fuentes-Bravo, Rocío, de la Vega, Rocío, Ruíz-Párraga, Gema T., Serrano-Ibáñez, Elena R., López-Martínez, Alicia E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Internal Medicine; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Research; Pain Medicine
• ISSN: 2193-8237; 2193-651X
• DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2

Introduction Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain—Revised (SOAPP-R). Methods We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study. Results Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649–0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522–0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423). Conclusion In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments.