Loading…
How have COVID‐19 stringency measures changed scholarly activity?
Government restrictions to the movement of people due to the COVID‐19 pandemic have had a wide range of effects on scientific activity. Here, we show that during the pandemic there has been a reduction in the number of registered non‐COVID‐19 clinical trials. Furthermore, using the Oxford COVID‐19 G...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2022-07, Vol.1513 (1), p.5-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Government restrictions to the movement of people due to the COVID‐19 pandemic have had a wide range of effects on scientific activity. Here, we show that during the pandemic there has been a reduction in the number of registered non‐COVID‐19 clinical trials. Furthermore, using the Oxford COVID‐19 Government Response Tracker Stringency Index (SI) as an indicator of COVID‐19–related workplace adjustment (e.g., restrictions on gatherings, workplace closures, and stay‐at‐home orders), we demonstrate that this drop in clinical trial registration has been greater in countries with a higher SI. This could have significant consequences for the discovery of treatments that are required to reduce the global burden of disease.
Government restrictions to the movement of people due to the COVID‐19 pandemic have had a wide range of effects on scientific activity. Here we show that during the pandemic, there has been a reduction in the number of registered non‐COVID‐19 clinical trials, which could have significant consequences for the discovery of treatments that are required to reduce the global burden of disease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0077-8923 1749-6632 |
DOI: | 10.1111/nyas.14767 |