Loading…
Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the Canterbury region of New Zealand
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotypes of Campylobacter isolates from 603 human patients were compared with 485 isolates from retail offal (primarily chicken and lamb) to identify temporal clusters and possible sources of campylobacteriosis. Detailed epidemiological information was collected fro...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Epidemiology and infection 2013-06, Vol.141 (6), p.1253-1266 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033 |
| container_end_page | 1266 |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1253 |
| container_title | Epidemiology and infection |
| container_volume | 141 |
| creator | GILPIN, B. J. WALSHE, G. ON, S. L. SMITH, D. MARSHALL, J. C. FRENCH, N. P. |
| description | Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotypes of Campylobacter isolates from 603 human patients were compared with 485 isolates from retail offal (primarily chicken and lamb) to identify temporal clusters and possible sources of campylobacteriosis. Detailed epidemiological information was collected from 364 of the patients, and when combined with genotyping data allowed a putative transmission pathway of campylobacteriosis to be assigned for 88% of patients. The sources of infection were 47% food, 28% direct animal contact, 7% overseas travel, 4% person-to-person transmission and 3% water-related. A significant summer increase in campylobacteriosis cases was primarily attributed to an increase in food-related cases. Genotyping of isolates was essential for identifying the likely cause of infection for individuals. However, a more rapid and cheaper typing tool for Campylobacter is needed, which if applied to human and animal isolates on a routine basis could advance greatly our understanding of the ongoing problem of Campylobacter infection in New Zealand. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0950268812001719 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9167653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0950268812001719</cupid><jstor_id>23462797</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23462797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2L1TAUxYsoznP0D3ChBERwU81X02QjDI_xAwZdqBs3IUlv3-SRNp2kVd5_P62vzoyKq3BzfvdwDrconhL8mmBSv_mCVYWpkJJQPM9E3Ss2hAtVco7V_WKzyOWinxSPct5jjBWV9cPihFKFBSN8U1ydDUPwzow-9ii2qIsB3BRMQjD4BjofQ9wd0BjR1DeQ8mj6xvc75Ew3HEK0xo2QfMw-I9-j8RLQ1vTzl53SASXYrbaf4Cf6DibM24-LB60JGZ6s72nx7d351-2H8uLz-4_bs4vSVZUYS-mcswQYCKZoRaXiVUNo0zjKKJdCgbRQK8O5lEAay4S1DreKArbStZix0-Lt0XeYbAeNg35MJugh-c6kg47G6z-V3l_qXfyhFRG1qBaDV6tBilcT5FF3PjsIcwmIU9aEKaUIlUzN6Iu_0H2cUj_X04QzWmPOfxmSI-VSzDlBexOGYL0cVP9z0Hnn-d0WNxu_LzgDL1fAZGdCm0zvfL7laoYZVYvRsyO3z2NMtzrjgtaqnnW2hjOdTb7ZwZ0O_413DZ-7w6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1432704453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the Canterbury region of New Zealand</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>GILPIN, B. J. ; WALSHE, G. ; ON, S. L. ; SMITH, D. ; MARSHALL, J. C. ; FRENCH, N. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>GILPIN, B. J. ; WALSHE, G. ; ON, S. L. ; SMITH, D. ; MARSHALL, J. C. ; FRENCH, N. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotypes of Campylobacter isolates from 603 human patients were compared with 485 isolates from retail offal (primarily chicken and lamb) to identify temporal clusters and possible sources of campylobacteriosis. Detailed epidemiological information was collected from 364 of the patients, and when combined with genotyping data allowed a putative transmission pathway of campylobacteriosis to be assigned for 88% of patients. The sources of infection were 47% food, 28% direct animal contact, 7% overseas travel, 4% person-to-person transmission and 3% water-related. A significant summer increase in campylobacteriosis cases was primarily attributed to an increase in food-related cases. Genotyping of isolates was essential for identifying the likely cause of infection for individuals. However, a more rapid and cheaper typing tool for Campylobacter is needed, which if applied to human and animal isolates on a routine basis could advance greatly our understanding of the ongoing problem of Campylobacter infection in New Zealand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-2688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0950268812001719</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22906314</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPINEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - genetics ; Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Campylobacter Infections - etiology ; Campylobacter Infections - microbiology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Disease ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field ; Epidemics ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Food Microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastrointestinal ; Genotype ; Humans ; Infant ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Male ; Microbiology ; Molecular Epidemiology - methods ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Original Papers ; Poultry ; Prevalence ; Risk factors ; Sheep ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and infection, 2013-06, Vol.141 (6), p.1253-1266</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2012 2012 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23462797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0950268812001719/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27303299$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22906314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GILPIN, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALSHE, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ON, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSHALL, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRENCH, N. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the Canterbury region of New Zealand</title><title>Epidemiology and infection</title><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><description>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotypes of Campylobacter isolates from 603 human patients were compared with 485 isolates from retail offal (primarily chicken and lamb) to identify temporal clusters and possible sources of campylobacteriosis. Detailed epidemiological information was collected from 364 of the patients, and when combined with genotyping data allowed a putative transmission pathway of campylobacteriosis to be assigned for 88% of patients. The sources of infection were 47% food, 28% direct animal contact, 7% overseas travel, 4% person-to-person transmission and 3% water-related. A significant summer increase in campylobacteriosis cases was primarily attributed to an increase in food-related cases. Genotyping of isolates was essential for identifying the likely cause of infection for individuals. However, a more rapid and cheaper typing tool for Campylobacter is needed, which if applied to human and animal isolates on a routine basis could advance greatly our understanding of the ongoing problem of Campylobacter infection in New Zealand.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - genetics</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology - methods</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0950-2688</issn><issn>1469-4409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc2L1TAUxYsoznP0D3ChBERwU81X02QjDI_xAwZdqBs3IUlv3-SRNp2kVd5_P62vzoyKq3BzfvdwDrconhL8mmBSv_mCVYWpkJJQPM9E3Ss2hAtVco7V_WKzyOWinxSPct5jjBWV9cPihFKFBSN8U1ydDUPwzow-9ii2qIsB3BRMQjD4BjofQ9wd0BjR1DeQ8mj6xvc75Ew3HEK0xo2QfMw-I9-j8RLQ1vTzl53SASXYrbaf4Cf6DibM24-LB60JGZ6s72nx7d351-2H8uLz-4_bs4vSVZUYS-mcswQYCKZoRaXiVUNo0zjKKJdCgbRQK8O5lEAay4S1DreKArbStZix0-Lt0XeYbAeNg35MJugh-c6kg47G6z-V3l_qXfyhFRG1qBaDV6tBilcT5FF3PjsIcwmIU9aEKaUIlUzN6Iu_0H2cUj_X04QzWmPOfxmSI-VSzDlBexOGYL0cVP9z0Hnn-d0WNxu_LzgDL1fAZGdCm0zvfL7laoYZVYvRsyO3z2NMtzrjgtaqnnW2hjOdTb7ZwZ0O_413DZ-7w6Q</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>GILPIN, B. J.</creator><creator>WALSHE, G.</creator><creator>ON, S. L.</creator><creator>SMITH, D.</creator><creator>MARSHALL, J. C.</creator><creator>FRENCH, N. P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the Canterbury region of New Zealand</title><author>GILPIN, B. J. ; WALSHE, G. ; ON, S. L. ; SMITH, D. ; MARSHALL, J. C. ; FRENCH, N. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - genetics</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology - methods</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GILPIN, B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALSHE, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ON, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSHALL, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRENCH, N. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GILPIN, B. J.</au><au>WALSHE, G.</au><au>ON, S. L.</au><au>SMITH, D.</au><au>MARSHALL, J. C.</au><au>FRENCH, N. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the Canterbury region of New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1253</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1253-1266</pages><issn>0950-2688</issn><eissn>1469-4409</eissn><coden>EPINEU</coden><abstract>Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis genotypes of Campylobacter isolates from 603 human patients were compared with 485 isolates from retail offal (primarily chicken and lamb) to identify temporal clusters and possible sources of campylobacteriosis. Detailed epidemiological information was collected from 364 of the patients, and when combined with genotyping data allowed a putative transmission pathway of campylobacteriosis to be assigned for 88% of patients. The sources of infection were 47% food, 28% direct animal contact, 7% overseas travel, 4% person-to-person transmission and 3% water-related. A significant summer increase in campylobacteriosis cases was primarily attributed to an increase in food-related cases. Genotyping of isolates was essential for identifying the likely cause of infection for individuals. However, a more rapid and cheaper typing tool for Campylobacter is needed, which if applied to human and animal isolates on a routine basis could advance greatly our understanding of the ongoing problem of Campylobacter infection in New Zealand.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>22906314</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0950268812001719</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0950-2688 |
| ispartof | Epidemiology and infection, 2013-06, Vol.141 (6), p.1253-1266 |
| issn | 0950-2688 1469-4409 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9167653 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Animals Biological and medical sciences Campylobacter Campylobacter - genetics Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology Campylobacter Infections - etiology Campylobacter Infections - microbiology Child Child, Preschool Disease Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field Epidemics Epidemiology Female Food Microbiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gastrointestinal Genotype Humans Infant Infections Laboratories Male Microbiology Molecular Epidemiology - methods New Zealand - epidemiology Original Papers Poultry Prevalence Risk factors Sheep Young Adult |
| title | Application of molecular epidemiology to understanding campylobacteriosis in the Canterbury region of New Zealand |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A31%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20molecular%20epidemiology%20to%20understanding%20campylobacteriosis%20in%20the%20Canterbury%20region%20of%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=GILPIN,%20B.%20J.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1253&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1253-1266&rft.issn=0950-2688&rft.eissn=1469-4409&rft.coden=EPINEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0950268812001719&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E23462797%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-8cccb1e3e6392528945d12ddc2324869e8be79a4488e1db36bbc0f92e0b8cf033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1432704453&rft_id=info:pmid/22906314&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0950268812001719&rft_jstor_id=23462797&rfr_iscdi=true |